ems.post Website Overview & Technology Report
🤖 AI Summary
We performed a comprehensive analysis of ems.post on 2026-06-27. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 39668ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 48 KB, and the site is served behind a CDN (Content Delivery Network).
Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted.
The security headers analysis reveals a score of 50/100 (moderate). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. However, the site is missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks.
Our technology detection scan identified 4 technologies across 4 categories powering ems.post. The detected stack includes Drupal, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and jQuery.
Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, ems.post receives an overall trust score of 70/100, classified as "Likely Safe".
HTTP Response
Status200 OK
Response Time39668ms
ProtocolHTTP/2
Page Size48 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNYes ✓
Servercloudflare
Total Requests69
3rd Party Domains3
Redirect5 hop(s)
Detected Technologies (4)
• Drupal
🏷️ Google Tag Manager
🔤 Google Fonts
📦 jQuery
Security Headers
✓
Content-Security-Policy
Set ✓
✗
Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
Not set
✓
X-Content-Type-Options
Set ✓
✗
Referrer-Policy
Not set
✗
Permissions-Policy
Not set
SSL Certificate
IssuerGoogle Trust Services
Issuer FullcountryName=US, organizationName=Google Trust Services, commonName=WE1
SubjectcommonName=ems.post
Type—
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
Cipher SuiteTLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Algorithm—
Issued—
Expires— (? days)
SANs—
ems.post Trust Score & Safety Analysis
🤖 AI Summary
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, ems.post receives a trust score of 70/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases.
The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a reject policy — the strongest available setting, DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) providing cryptographic email verification, and DNSSEC providing authenticated DNS responses.
Areas of concern include: missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties and the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved.
We checked ems.post against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Trust Signals
✅ Valid HTTPS
✅ SPF configured
✅ DMARC configured (p=reject)
✅ DKIM configured
✅ DNSSEC enabled
⚠️ Missing Referrer-Policy
Blacklist Checks (8/8 clean)
✓
Google Safe Browsing
clean
✓
Phishtank
clean
✓
Urlhaus
clean
✓
Openphish
clean
✓
Dnsfilter
clean
✓
Spamhaus Dbl
clean
✓
Surbl
clean
✓
Virustotal
clean
ems.post Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
🤖 AI Summary
Our technology detection engine scanned ems.post and identified 4 distinct technologies across 4 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records.
CMS: Drupal — manages the content and page structure for ems.post.
Tag Manager: Google Tag Manager — manages marketing and analytics tags without code changes for ems.post.
Fonts: Google Fonts — delivers web fonts for typography for ems.post.
JavaScript Library: jQuery — provides utility functions and DOM manipulation for ems.post.
We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Tag Manager container GTM-PTPQVXK. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.
CMS
Tag Manager
🏷️ Google Tag Manager(95%)
Fonts
JavaScript Library
Tracking IDs
ems.post Performance, Speed & Core Web Vitals
🤖 AI Summary
ems.post delivers its homepage in 39668ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 48 KB, and we detected 69 resource requests loading assets from 3 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain.
The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections.
Asset minification status: 0 out of 3 CSS files and 2 out of 8 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 9 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality.
The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors.
From an environmental perspective, each page view of ems.post produces approximately 0.02g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 48 KB is the primary factor in this calculation.
Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for ems.post. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Core Web Vitals data not available
Requires CrUX API key configuration
Carbon Footprint
CO₂ per page view0.02g
RatingA
Page Weight & Optimization
HTML Size48 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNYes ✓
Total Requests69
3rd Party Domains3
CSS Minified0/3
JS Minified2/8
ems.post DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
🤖 AI Summary
ems.post resolves to the IPv4 address 172.67.72.217 and also supports IPv6 (2606:4700:20::ac43:48d9), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 3 A record(s) configured.
The domain name system is managed by 2 name servers: heidi.ns.cloudflare.com and neil.ns.cloudflare.com. Having 2 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used.
Email for ems.post is handled by Google Workspace with 1 MX records configured: smtp.google.com. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server.
SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a reject policy — the strongest setting, instructing receiving servers to reject unauthorized emails entirely. DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) is configured, adding a cryptographic signature to outgoing emails that receiving servers can verify to confirm the email hasn't been tampered with in transit.
DNSSEC is enabled for ems.post, providing an additional layer of security by cryptographically signing DNS records. This prevents DNS cache poisoning and man-in-the-middle attacks that could redirect visitors to malicious websites.
Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 1 active subdomains for ems.post: www.ems.post. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
DNS Records
A
172.67.72.217
104.26.4.239
104.26.5.239
NS
heidi.ns.cloudflare.com
neil.ns.cloudflare.com
Email & Authentication
MX ProviderGoogle Workspace
Registrar—
Organisation—
Country—
Contact—
Registered—
Expires—
Domain Age—
IPv6 SupportYes ✓
Subdomains (1 found)
ems.post Page Content, Images & Accessibility
🤖 AI Summary
The homepage of ems.post contains 221 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 2 H2 headings, 3 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings.
The page includes 8 images. All images have proper alt text attributes ✓, which is excellent for both accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (search engines can understand image content).
The link structure consists of 34 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 5 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 8 external JavaScript files, 3 CSS stylesheets, and 1 iframes on the page.
The site implements the following web standards and features: Progressive Web App (PWA) manifest (enabling app-like installation).
Notable missing features: XML Sitemap, robots.txt, and Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility.
Content Structure
H1—
H2 Tags2
H3 Tags3
H4 Tags0
H5 Tags0
H6 Tags0
Internal Links34
External Links5
Assets & Features
JavaScript Files8
JS Minified2/8
CSS Files3
CSS Minified0/3
Iframes1
Images8
Missing Alt0
SitemapNo
Robots.txtNo
PWAYes ✓
AMPNo
RSS FeedNo
ems.post SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Open Graph
🤖 AI Summary
The title tag for ems.post is good at 14 characters: "Homepage | EMS". The length is acceptable, though it may be slightly truncated in some search result displays.
No meta description is configured for ems.post. This is a critical SEO oversight — without a meta description, Google will auto-generate a snippet from page content, which may not accurately represent the page or entice users to click. Adding a unique, compelling meta description of 120-155 characters is strongly recommended.
The canonical url is correctly set to https://ems.post/en, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as en, and a favicon is configured.
No Open Graph tags are configured. When someone shares a link to ems.post on social media, the platform will have to guess the title, description, and image — often producing unattractive or inaccurate previews. Adding OG tags is essential for social media marketing.
Google SERP Preview
Homepage | EMS
https://ems.post
Meta Tags
TitleHomepage | EMS...
Title Length14 chars
Meta Desc Length0 chars
H1—
Languageen
Canonicalhttps://ems.post/en
Meta Robotsnot set
Meta Keywordsnot set
Schema.org & Social
Schema Types—
OG Type—
OG ImageNot set
Twitter Card—
FaviconSet ✓
ems.post Related Domains & Cross-References
🤖 AI Summary
Related domain discovery works by finding other websites that share the same IP address, Google Tag Manager container ID, Google Analytics property, or advertising pixel IDs with ems.post. This data becomes available after batch-crawling the domain database — individual domain lookups cannot populate this section. We extracted the following tracking IDs that can be used for cross-referencing: gtm_id: GTM-PTPQVXK.
Tracking IDs for Cross-Referencing
Related Domains
Related domain data requires database (populated after batch crawl)