fost.ws

HTTPS HTTP/1.1 Gzip Crawled in 26,293ms · June 27, 2026 19:22 UTC

fost.ws Website Overview & Technology Report

🤖 AI Summary
We performed a comprehensive analysis of fost.ws on 2026-06-27. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 8627ms. The page is served over HTTP/1.1 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 85 KB. Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 15/100 (poor). The following security headers are properly configured: X-Frame-Options. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 2 technologies across 2 categories powering fost.ws. The detected stack includes Vite and jQuery. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, fost.ws receives an overall trust score of 53/100, classified as "Caution Advised".
53
/ 100
Trust Score
15
/ 100
Security Headers
HTTP Response
Status200 OK
Response Time8627ms
ProtocolHTTP/1.1
Page Size85 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNNo
Servernginx/1.28.1
Total Requests311
3rd Party Domains1
RedirectNone
Detected Technologies (2)
🔨 Vite 📦 jQuery
Security Headers
Content-Security-Policy
Not set
Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
Not set
X-Frame-Options
Set ✓
X-Content-Type-Options
Not set
Referrer-Policy
Not set
Permissions-Policy
Not set
SSL Certificate
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Issuer FullcountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=YR2
SubjectcommonName=fost.ws
Type
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
Cipher SuiteTLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Algorithm
Issued
Expires— (? days)
SANs

fost.ws Trust Score & Safety Analysis

🤖 AI Summary
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, fost.ws receives a trust score of 53/100, which places it in the "Caution Advised" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked fost.ws against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
53
/ 100
Caution Advised
Trust Signals
Valid HTTPS
⚠️ DNSSEC not enabled
Sitemap.xml found
Robots.txt found
⚠️ Missing Content-Security-Policy
⚠️ Missing Referrer-Policy
Blacklist Checks (8/8 clean)
Google Safe Browsing clean
Phishtank clean
Urlhaus clean
Openphish clean
Dnsfilter clean
Spamhaus Dbl clean
Surbl clean
Virustotal clean

fost.ws Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 AI Summary
Our technology detection engine scanned fost.ws and identified 2 distinct technologies across 2 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. Build Tool: Vite — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for fost.ws. JavaScript Library: jQuery — provides utility functions and DOM manipulation for fost.ws.
Build Tool
🔨 Vite(95%)
JavaScript Library
📦 jQuery(95%)

fost.ws Performance, Speed & Core Web Vitals

🤖 AI Summary
fost.ws delivers its homepage in 8627ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 85 KB, and we detected 311 resource requests loading assets from 1 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 8 CSS files and 0 out of 13 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 21 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of fost.ws produces approximately 0.04g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 85 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for fost.ws. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Core Web Vitals data not available
Requires CrUX API key configuration
Carbon Footprint
CO₂ per page view0.04g
RatingA
Page Weight & Optimization
HTML Size85 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNNo
Total Requests311
3rd Party Domains1
CSS Minified0/8
JS Minified0/13

fost.ws DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 AI Summary
fost.ws resolves to the IPv4 address 193.169.105.204, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 4 name servers: ns1.zomro.net, ns2.zomro.ru, ns3.zomro.com, and ns4.zomro.su. Having 4 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for fost.ws is handled by fost.ws with 2 MX records configured: mail.fost.ws and mail.fost.ws. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF is not configured, meaning any server could potentially send emails pretending to be from this domain. This is a significant email security concern. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is not enabled for fost.ws. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 3 active subdomains for fost.ws: ftp.fost.ws, mail.fost.ws, and www.fost.ws. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
DNS Records
A
193.169.105.204
NS
ns1.zomro.net
ns2.zomro.ru
ns3.zomro.com
ns4.zomro.su
MX
mail.fost.ws
mail.fost.ws
Email & Authentication
SPF
DMARC p=—
DKIM
DNSSEC
MX Providerfost.ws
Registrar
Organisation
Country
Contact
Registered
Expires
Domain Age
IPv6 SupportNo
Subdomains (3 found)
ftp.fost.ws mail.fost.ws www.fost.ws

fost.ws Page Content, Images & Accessibility

🤖 AI Summary
The homepage of fost.ws contains 1,897 words of visible text content. This is a substantial amount of content that provides good opportunities for search engine indexing. The page is structured with 16 H2 headings, 14 H3 headings, 3 H4 headings, 3 H5, and 0 H6 headings. The page includes 18 images. All images have proper alt text attributes ✓, which is excellent for both accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (search engines can understand image content). The link structure consists of 264 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 1 external link pointing to third-party websites. The high number of internal links suggests a well-interconnected site structure, which helps search engines discover and crawl all pages efficiently. There are 13 external JavaScript files, 8 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages) and robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior). Notable missing features: Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility.
1,897
Words
18
Images
100%
Alt Text Score
85
Page Size (KB)
Content Structure
H1Первый открытый софт-трекер
H2 Tags16
H3 Tags14
H4 Tags3
H5 Tags3
H6 Tags0
Internal Links264
External Links1
Assets & Features
JavaScript Files13
JS Minified0/13
CSS Files8
CSS Minified0/8
Iframes0
Images18
Missing Alt0
SitemapYes ✓
Robots.txtYes ✓
PWANo
AMPNo
RSS FeedNo

fost.ws SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Open Graph

🤖 AI Summary
The title tag for fost.ws is too long at 105 characters: "Торрент софт программы - открытый торрент трекер без регистрации Fost скачать то...". At 105 characters, the title will likely be truncated in Google search results (recommended: 50-60 characters). Consider shortening it while keeping the most important keywords at the beginning. The meta description is 141 characters (well-optimized): "Лучший открытый торрент трекер Fost без регистрации - скачать cборники софт, программы для компьютера, самый надежный с...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://fost.ws/, preventing duplicate content issues and a favicon is configured. No Open Graph tags are configured. When someone shares a link to fost.ws on social media, the platform will have to guess the title, description, and image — often producing unattractive or inaccurate previews. Adding OG tags is essential for social media marketing. The meta keywords tag contains 2 terms including Открытый торрент трекер and без регистрации и рейтинга. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.
Google SERP Preview
Торрент софт программы - открытый торрент трекер без регистрации Fost скачать торрент бесплатно - Fost.ws
https://fost.ws
Лучший открытый торрент трекер Fost без регистрации - скачать cборники софт, программы для компьютера, самый надежный сборник через торрент.
Meta Tags
TitleТоррент софт программы - открытый торрент трекер без регистр...
Title Length105 chars
Meta Desc Length141 chars
H1Первый открытый софт-трекер
Language
Canonicalhttps://fost.ws/
Meta Robotsnot set
Meta KeywordsОткрытый торрент трекер, без регистрации и рейтинга
Schema.org & Social
Schema Types
OG Type
OG ImageNot set
Twitter Card
FaviconSet ✓