imageshack.us Website Overview & Technology Report
🤖 AI Summary
We performed a comprehensive analysis of imageshack.us on 2026-06-27. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 3703ms. The page is served over HTTP/1.1 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 8 KB, and the site is served behind a CDN (Content Delivery Network).
Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted.
The security headers analysis reveals a score of 15/100 (poor). The following security headers are properly configured: X-Frame-Options. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks.
Our technology detection scan identified 6 technologies across 6 categories powering imageshack.us. The detected stack includes Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts, and jQuery 1.9.1..
Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, imageshack.us receives an overall trust score of 48/100, classified as "Caution Advised".
HTTP Response
Status200 OK
Response Time3703ms
ProtocolHTTP/1.1
Page Size8 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNYes ✓
Servernginx
Total Requests24
3rd Party Domains4
RedirectNone
Detected Technologies (6)
📊 Google Analytics 4
🏷️ Google Tag Manager
📢 Meta Pixel
🔒 reCAPTCHA v3
🔤 Google Fonts
📦 jQuery
Security Headers
✗
Content-Security-Policy
Not set
✗
Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
Not set
✗
X-Content-Type-Options
Not set
✗
Referrer-Policy
Not set
✗
Permissions-Policy
Not set
SSL Certificate
IssuerGoDaddy.com, Inc.
Issuer FullcountryName=US, stateOrProvinceName=Arizona, localityName=Scottsdale, organizationName=GoDaddy.com, Inc., organizationalUnitName=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/, commonName=Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
SubjectcommonName=*.imageshack.us
Type—
TLS VersionTLS 1.2
Cipher SuiteECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
Algorithm—
Issued—
Expires— (? days)
SANs—
imageshack.us Trust Score & Safety Analysis
🤖 AI Summary
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, imageshack.us receives a trust score of 48/100, which places it in the "Caution Advised" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases.
The analysis identified several positive trust signals: SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing.
Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved.
We checked imageshack.us against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Trust Signals
✅ SPF configured
⚠️ DNSSEC not enabled
⚠️ Missing Content-Security-Policy
⚠️ Missing Referrer-Policy
Blacklist Checks (8/8 clean)
✓
Google Safe Browsing
clean
✓
Phishtank
clean
✓
Urlhaus
clean
✓
Openphish
clean
✓
Dnsfilter
clean
✓
Spamhaus Dbl
clean
✓
Surbl
clean
✓
Virustotal
clean
imageshack.us Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
🤖 AI Summary
Our technology detection engine scanned imageshack.us and identified 6 distinct technologies across 6 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records.
Analytics: Google Analytics 4 — tracks visitor behavior and provides traffic insights for imageshack.us.
Tag Manager: Google Tag Manager — manages marketing and analytics tags without code changes for imageshack.us.
Advertising: Meta Pixel — handles advertising pixel tracking and conversion measurement for imageshack.us.
Security: reCAPTCHA v3 — provides security features like bot detection and CAPTCHA for imageshack.us.
Fonts: Google Fonts — delivers web fonts for typography for imageshack.us.
JavaScript Library: jQuery (version 1.9.1.) — provides utility functions and DOM manipulation for imageshack.us.
We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Tag Manager container GTM-MK2HJHP. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.
Analytics
📊 Google Analytics 4(95%)
Tag Manager
🏷️ Google Tag Manager(95%)
Advertising
Security
Fonts
JavaScript Library
Tracking IDs
imageshack.us Performance, Speed & Core Web Vitals
🤖 AI Summary
imageshack.us delivers its homepage in 3703ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 8 KB, and we detected 24 resource requests loading assets from 4 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain.
The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections.
Asset minification status: 2 out of 3 CSS files and 2 out of 3 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 2 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality.
The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors.
From an environmental perspective, each page view of imageshack.us produces approximately 0.0g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 8 KB is the primary factor in this calculation.
Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for imageshack.us. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Core Web Vitals data not available
Requires CrUX API key configuration
Carbon Footprint
CO₂ per page view0.0g
RatingA
Page Weight & Optimization
HTML Size8 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNYes ✓
Total Requests24
3rd Party Domains4
CSS Minified2/3
JS Minified2/3
imageshack.us DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
🤖 AI Summary
imageshack.us resolves to the IPv4 address 208.94.3.18, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured.
The domain name system is managed by 4 name servers: ns2.imageshack.us, ns3.imageshack.us, ns4.imageshack.us, and ns5.imageshack.us. Having 4 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used.
Email for imageshack.us is handled by Google Workspace with 7 MX records configured: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM, ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM, and ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM and 4 more. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server.
SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic.
DNSSEC is not enabled for imageshack.us. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions.
Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 4 active subdomains for imageshack.us: api.imageshack.us, blog.imageshack.us, ftp.imageshack.us, and www.imageshack.us. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
DNS Records
NS
ns2.imageshack.us
ns3.imageshack.us
ns4.imageshack.us
ns5.imageshack.us
MX
ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
ASPMX4.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
ASPMX5.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
Email & Authentication
MX ProviderGoogle Workspace
Registrar—
Organisation—
Country—
Contact—
Registered—
Expires—
Domain Age—
IPv6 SupportNo
Subdomains (4 found)
api.imageshack.us blog.imageshack.us ftp.imageshack.us www.imageshack.us
imageshack.us Page Content, Images & Accessibility
🤖 AI Summary
The homepage of imageshack.us contains 60 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 0 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings.
The link structure consists of 13 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 1 external link pointing to third-party websites. There are 3 external JavaScript files, 3 CSS stylesheets, and 2 iframes on the page.
Notable missing features: XML Sitemap, robots.txt, and Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility.
We detected the following payment methods accepted on imageshack.us: Discover. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates.
Content Structure
H1Your images have never looked better.
H2 Tags0
H3 Tags0
H4 Tags0
H5 Tags0
H6 Tags0
Internal Links13
External Links1
Assets & Features
JavaScript Files3
JS Minified2/3
CSS Files3
CSS Minified2/3
Iframes2
Images0
Missing Alt0
SitemapNo
Robots.txtNo
PWANo
AMPNo
RSS FeedNo
Payment Methods Detected
imageshack.us SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Open Graph
🤖 AI Summary
The title tag for imageshack.us is too long at 77 characters: "ImageShack - Best place for all of your image hosting and image sharing needs". At 77 characters, the title will likely be truncated in Google search results (recommended: 50-60 characters). Consider shortening it while keeping the most important keywords at the beginning.
The meta description is 133 characters (well-optimized): "Host your images online with an easy to use image uploader, albums, photo hosting, sharing, dynamic image resizing on we...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results.
The page language is declared as en, the meta robots directive is set to index,follow, and a favicon is configured.
No Open Graph tags are configured. When someone shares a link to imageshack.us on social media, the platform will have to guess the title, description, and image — often producing unattractive or inaccurate previews. Adding OG tags is essential for social media marketing.
The meta keywords tag contains 10 terms including Pictures, Hosting, Pics, Photo Gallery, and Pictures. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.
Google SERP Preview
ImageShack - Best place for all of your image hosting and image sharing needs
https://imageshack.us
Host your images online with an easy to use image uploader, albums, photo hosting, sharing, dynamic image resizing on web and mobile.
Meta Tags
TitleImageShack - Best place for all of your image hosting and im...
Title Length77 chars
Meta Desc Length133 chars
H1Your images have never looked better.
Languageen
Canonical—
Meta Robotsindex,follow
Meta KeywordsPictures,Hosting, Pics, Photo Gallery, Pictures, Photos, Ima...
Schema.org & Social
Schema Types—
OG Type—
OG ImageNot set
Twitter Card—
FaviconSet ✓
imageshack.us Related Domains & Cross-References
🤖 AI Summary
Related domain discovery works by finding other websites that share the same IP address, Google Tag Manager container ID, Google Analytics property, or advertising pixel IDs with imageshack.us. This data becomes available after batch-crawling the domain database — individual domain lookups cannot populate this section. We extracted the following tracking IDs that can be used for cross-referencing: gtm_id: GTM-MK2HJHP.
Tracking IDs for Cross-Referencing
Related Domains
Related domain data requires database (populated after batch crawl)