marksangryreview.com

HTTPS HTTP/2 HSTS Gzip WooCommerce Crawled in 38,046ms · June 27, 2026 23:19 UTC

marksangryreview.com Website Overview & Technology Report

🤖 AI Summary
We performed a comprehensive analysis of marksangryreview.com on 2026-06-27. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 14340ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 138 KB. Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 40/100 (below average). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS). However, the site is missing X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 7 technologies across 7 categories powering marksangryreview.com. The detected stack includes WordPress 7.0, WooCommerce, Google Analytics 4, Google AdSense, Mailchimp, Google Fonts, and jQuery. The primary e-commerce platform is WooCommerce. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, marksangryreview.com receives an overall trust score of 70/100, classified as "Likely Safe".
70
/ 100
Trust Score
40
/ 100
Security Headers
HTTP Response
Status200 OK
Response Time14340ms
ProtocolHTTP/2
Page Size138 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNNo
Servernginx
Total Requests275
3rd Party Domains14
RedirectNone
Detected Technologies (7)
• WordPress 🛒 WooCommerce 📊 Google Analytics 4 📢 Google AdSense 📧 Mailchimp 🔤 Google Fonts 📦 jQuery
Security Headers
Content-Security-Policy
Set ✓
Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
Set ✓
X-Frame-Options
Not set
X-Content-Type-Options
Not set
Referrer-Policy
Not set
Permissions-Policy
Not set
SSL Certificate
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Issuer FullcountryName=US, organizationName=Let's Encrypt, commonName=R12
SubjectcommonName=*.marksangryreview.com
Type
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
Cipher SuiteTLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Algorithm
Issued
Expires— (? days)
SANs

marksangryreview.com Trust Score & Safety Analysis

🤖 AI Summary
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, marksangryreview.com receives a trust score of 70/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) enforcement preventing protocol downgrade attacks, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a none policy, and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) providing cryptographic email verification. Areas of concern include: no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked marksangryreview.com against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
70
/ 100
Likely Safe
Trust Signals
Valid HTTPS
HSTS enabled
SPF configured
DMARC configured (p=none)
DKIM configured
⚠️ DNSSEC not enabled
Sitemap.xml found
⚠️ Missing X-Frame-Options
⚠️ Missing Referrer-Policy
Blacklist Checks (8/8 clean)
Google Safe Browsing clean
Phishtank clean
Urlhaus clean
Openphish clean
Dnsfilter clean
Spamhaus Dbl clean
Surbl clean
Virustotal clean

marksangryreview.com Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 AI Summary
Our technology detection engine scanned marksangryreview.com and identified 7 distinct technologies across 7 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. CMS: WordPress (version 7.0) — manages the content and page structure for marksangryreview.com. Ecommerce: WooCommerce — powers the online store and shopping functionality for marksangryreview.com. Analytics: Google Analytics 4 — tracks visitor behavior and provides traffic insights for marksangryreview.com. Advertising: Google AdSense — handles advertising pixel tracking and conversion measurement for marksangryreview.com. Email Marketing: Mailchimp — manages email campaigns and subscriber lists for marksangryreview.com. Fonts: Google Fonts — delivers web fonts for typography for marksangryreview.com. JavaScript Library: jQuery — provides utility functions and DOM manipulation for marksangryreview.com. We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Analytics 4 Measurement ID G-VN08G27CF8. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.
CMS
• WordPress 7.0(100%)
Ecommerce
🛒 WooCommerce(95%)
Analytics
📊 Google Analytics 4(95%)
Advertising
📢 Google AdSense(95%)
Email Marketing
📧 Mailchimp(95%)
Fonts
🔤 Google Fonts(95%)
JavaScript Library
📦 jQuery(95%)
Tracking IDs
ga4_idG-VN08G27CF8

marksangryreview.com Performance, Speed & Core Web Vitals

🤖 AI Summary
marksangryreview.com delivers its homepage in 14340ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 138 KB, and we detected 275 resource requests loading assets from 14 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 2 CSS files and 2 out of 10 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 10 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of marksangryreview.com produces approximately 0.07g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 138 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for marksangryreview.com. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Core Web Vitals data not available
Requires CrUX API key configuration
Carbon Footprint
CO₂ per page view0.07g
RatingA
Page Weight & Optimization
HTML Size138 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNNo
Total Requests275
3rd Party Domains14
CSS Minified0/2
JS Minified2/10

marksangryreview.com DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 AI Summary
marksangryreview.com resolves to the IPv4 address 35.208.69.64, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 2 name servers: ns1.siteground.net and ns2.siteground.net. Having 2 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for marksangryreview.com is handled by mailspamprotection.com with 3 MX records configured: mx10.mailspamprotection.com, mx20.mailspamprotection.com, and mx30.mailspamprotection.com. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a none policy — a monitoring-only setting that doesn't enforce any action on unauthorized emails. DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) is configured, adding a cryptographic signature to outgoing emails that receiving servers can verify to confirm the email hasn't been tampered with in transit. DNSSEC is not enabled for marksangryreview.com. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 3 active subdomains for marksangryreview.com: ftp.marksangryreview.com, mail.marksangryreview.com, and www.marksangryreview.com. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
DNS Records
A
35.208.69.64
NS
ns1.siteground.net
ns2.siteground.net
MX
mx10.mailspamprotection.com
mx20.mailspamprotection.com
mx30.mailspamprotection.com
Email & Authentication
SPF
DMARC p=none
DKIM
DNSSEC
MX Providermailspamprotection.com
Registrar
Organisation
Country
Contact
Registered
Expires
Domain Age
IPv6 SupportNo
Subdomains (3 found)
ftp.marksangryreview.com mail.marksangryreview.com www.marksangryreview.com

marksangryreview.com Page Content, Images & Accessibility

🤖 AI Summary
The homepage of marksangryreview.com contains 1,244 words of visible text content. This is a substantial amount of content that provides good opportunities for search engine indexing. The page is structured with 11 H2 headings, 1 H3 headings, 10 H4 headings. The page includes 33 images. 21 images (64%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 36% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images. The link structure consists of 159 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 35 external links pointing to third-party websites. The high number of internal links suggests a well-interconnected site structure, which helps search engines discover and crawl all pages efficiently. There are 10 external JavaScript files, 2 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), Schema.org structured data (BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, ImageObject, ListItem, Organization, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, and WebSite), and RSS feed for content syndication. Notable missing features: robots.txt. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. The website has social media presence across 3 platforms: Facebook (@sharer.php), Twitter (@MarksAngry), and Youtube (@UCNGtA2ShkGVeua4aV2-o3WA). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.
1,244
Words
33
Images
36%
Alt Text Score
138
Page Size (KB)
Content Structure
H1Marks Angry Review
H2 Tags11
H3 Tags1
H4 Tags10
H5 Tags0
H6 Tags0
Internal Links159
External Links35
Assets & Features
JavaScript Files10
JS Minified2/10
CSS Files2
CSS Minified0/2
Iframes0
Images33
Missing Alt21
SitemapYes ✓
Robots.txtNo
PWANo
AMPNo
RSS FeedYes ✓
Schema.org Types
BreadcrumbListCollectionPageEntryPointImageObjectListItemOrganizationPropertyValueSpecificationSearchActionWebSite
Social Media Presence
Facebook: @sharer.phpTwitter: @MarksAngryYoutube: @UCNGtA2ShkGVeua4aV2-o3WA

marksangryreview.com SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Open Graph

🤖 AI Summary
The title tag for marksangryreview.com is well-optimized at 52 characters: "Marks Angry Review - Review of Lords Mobile & Gaming". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation. The meta description is 127 characters (well-optimized): "A fiery Lords Mobile blog that also reviews electronic devices, and tackles the gaming issues that everyone is afraid to...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://marksangryreview.com/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as en-us, the meta robots directive is set to index, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1, and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 3/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Marks Angry Review..."), OG description, OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary_large_image is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary_large_image" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type. The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, ImageObject, ListItem, Organization, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, and WebSite. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates.
Google SERP Preview
Marks Angry Review - Review of Lords Mobile & Gaming
https://marksangryreview.com
A fiery Lords Mobile blog that also reviews electronic devices, and tackles the gaming issues that everyone is afraid to touch.
Meta Tags
TitleMarks Angry Review - Review of Lords Mobile & Gaming...
Title Length52 chars
Meta Desc Length127 chars
H1Marks Angry Review
Languageen-US
Canonicalhttps://marksangryreview.com/
Meta Robotsindex, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1
Meta Keywordsnot set
Schema.org & Social
Schema TypesBreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, ImageObject, ListItem, Organization, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, WebSite
OG Typewebsite
OG ImageNot set
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
FaviconSet ✓