bing.com Website Overview & Technology Report
🤖 AI Summary
We performed a comprehensive analysis of bing.com on 2026-06-28. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 19953ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 188 KB.
Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted.
The security headers analysis reveals a score of 70/100 (good). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and Permissions-Policy. However, the site is missing X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks.
Our technology detection scan identified 3 technologies across 3 categories powering bing.com. The detected stack includes React, Vite, and Google Analytics 4. The UI is built with React.
Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, bing.com receives an overall trust score of 75/100, classified as "Likely Safe".
HTTP Response
Status200 OK
Response Time19953ms
ProtocolHTTP/2
Page Size188 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNNo
Server—
Total Requests59
3rd Party Domains12
Redirect1 hop(s)
Detected Technologies (3)
⚛️ React
🔨 Vite
📊 Google Analytics 4
Security Headers
✓
Content-Security-Policy
Set ✓
✓
Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS)
Set ✓
✗
X-Content-Type-Options
Not set
✗
Referrer-Policy
Not set
✓
Permissions-Policy
Set ✓
SSL Certificate
IssuerMicrosoft Corporation
Issuer FullcountryName=US, organizationName=Microsoft Corporation, commonName=Microsoft TLS G2 RSA CA OCSP 02
SubjectcountryName=US, stateOrProvinceName=WA, localityName=Redmond, organizationName=Microsoft Corporation, commonName=www.bing.com
Type—
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
Cipher SuiteTLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Algorithm—
Issued—
Expires— (? days)
SANs—
bing.com Trust Score & Safety Analysis
🤖 AI Summary
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, bing.com receives a trust score of 75/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases.
The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) enforcement preventing protocol downgrade attacks, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, and DMARC email authentication with a reject policy — the strongest available setting.
Areas of concern include: missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved.
We checked bing.com against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Trust Signals
✅ Valid HTTPS
✅ HSTS enabled
✅ SPF configured
✅ DMARC configured (p=reject)
⚠️ DNSSEC not enabled
✅ Sitemap.xml found
✅ Robots.txt found
⚠️ Missing Referrer-Policy
Blacklist Checks (8/8 clean)
✓
Google Safe Browsing
clean
✓
Phishtank
clean
✓
Urlhaus
clean
✓
Openphish
clean
✓
Dnsfilter
clean
✓
Spamhaus Dbl
clean
✓
Surbl
clean
✓
Virustotal
clean
bing.com Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
🤖 AI Summary
Our technology detection engine scanned bing.com and identified 3 distinct technologies across 3 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records.
UI Library: React — handles the user interface rendering and component management for bing.com.
Build Tool: Vite — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for bing.com.
Analytics: Google Analytics 4 — tracks visitor behavior and provides traffic insights for bing.com.
We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Analytics 4 Measurement ID G-ICON. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.
UI Library
Build Tool
Analytics
📊 Google Analytics 4(95%)
Tracking IDs
bing.com Performance, Speed & Core Web Vitals
🤖 AI Summary
bing.com delivers its homepage in 19953ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 188 KB, and we detected 59 resource requests loading assets from 12 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain.
The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections.
Asset minification status: 0 out of 0 CSS files and 0 out of 3 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 3 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality.
From an environmental perspective, each page view of bing.com produces approximately 0.09g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 188 KB is the primary factor in this calculation.
Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for bing.com. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Core Web Vitals data not available
Requires CrUX API key configuration
Carbon Footprint
CO₂ per page view0.09g
RatingA
Page Weight & Optimization
HTML Size188 KB
CompressionGzip
Compression Savings~60.0%
CDNNo
Total Requests59
3rd Party Domains12
CSS Minified0/0
JS Minified0/3
bing.com DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
🤖 AI Summary
bing.com resolves to the IPv4 address 150.171.28.10 and also supports IPv6 (2620:1ec:33:1::10), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured.
The domain name system is managed by 8 name servers: dns1.p09.nsone.net, dns2.p09.nsone.net, dns3.p09.nsone.net, dns4.p09.nsone.net, ns1-204.azure-dns.com, ns2-204.azure-dns.net, ns3-204.azure-dns.org, and ns4-204.azure-dns.info. Having 8 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used.
Email for bing.com is handled by Microsoft 365 with 1 MX records configured: bing-com.mail.protection.outlook.com. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server.
SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a reject policy — the strongest setting, instructing receiving servers to reject unauthorized emails entirely. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic.
DNSSEC is not enabled for bing.com. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions.
Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 25 active subdomains for bing.com: admin.bing.com, api.bing.com, app.bing.com, apps.bing.com, blog.bing.com, cdn.bing.com, community.bing.com, and dev.bing.com. Plus 17 additional subdomains. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
DNS Records
A
150.171.28.10
150.171.27.10
NS
dns1.p09.nsone.net
dns2.p09.nsone.net
dns3.p09.nsone.net
dns4.p09.nsone.net
ns1-204.azure-dns.com
ns2-204.azure-dns.net
ns3-204.azure-dns.org
ns4-204.azure-dns.info
MX
bing-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
Email & Authentication
MX ProviderMicrosoft 365
Registrar—
Organisation—
Country—
Contact—
Registered—
Expires—
Domain Age—
IPv6 SupportYes ✓
Subdomains (25 found)
admin.bing.com api.bing.com app.bing.com apps.bing.com blog.bing.com cdn.bing.com community.bing.com dev.bing.com developers.bing.com docs.bing.com ftp.bing.com help.bing.com m.bing.com mail.bing.com partners.bing.com portal.bing.com shop.bing.com smtp.bing.com staging.bing.com static.bing.com status.bing.com store.bing.com support.bing.com webmail.bing.com www.bing.com
bing.com Page Content, Images & Accessibility
🤖 AI Summary
The homepage of bing.com contains 73 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 1 H2 headings, 1 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings.
The page includes 2 images. 1 images (50%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 50% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images.
The link structure consists of 28 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 18 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 3 external JavaScript files, 0 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page.
The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages) and robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior).
Notable missing features: Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility.
We detected the following payment methods accepted on bing.com: Visa and Discover. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates.
Content Structure
H1—
H2 Tags1
H3 Tags1
H4 Tags0
H5 Tags0
H6 Tags0
Internal Links28
External Links18
Assets & Features
JavaScript Files3
JS Minified0/3
CSS Files0
CSS Minified0/0
Iframes0
Images2
Missing Alt1
SitemapYes ✓
Robots.txtYes ✓
PWANo
AMPNo
RSS FeedNo
Payment Methods Detected
bing.com SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Open Graph
🤖 AI Summary
The title tag for bing.com is good at 21 characters: "Haku – Microsoft Bing". The length is acceptable, though it may be slightly truncated in some search result displays.
The meta description is 182 characters (slightly long): "Hae Microsoft Bingillä ja hyödynnä tekoälyä tietojen etsimiseen, verkkosivujen, kuvien, videoiden, karttojen ja muiden t...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results.
The canonical url is correctly set to https://www.bing.com/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as fi, and a favicon is configured.
Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Info..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol.
Google SERP Preview
Haku – Microsoft Bing
https://bing.com
Hae Microsoft Bingillä ja hyödynnä tekoälyä tietojen etsimiseen, verkkosivujen, kuvien, videoiden, karttojen ja muiden toimintojen tutkimiseen. Älykäs hakukone, joka on aina utelias.
Meta Tags
TitleHaku – Microsoft Bing...
Title Length21 chars
Meta Desc Length182 chars
H1—
Languagefi
Canonicalhttps://www.bing.com/
Meta Robotsnot set
Meta Keywordsnot set
Schema.org & Social
Schema Types—
OG Typewebsite
OG ImageSet ✓
Twitter Card—
FaviconSet ✓
Open Graph Preview
bing.com
Info
At Boneyard Beach within Hunting Island State Park
bing.com Related Domains & Cross-References
🤖 AI Summary
Related domain discovery works by finding other websites that share the same IP address, Google Tag Manager container ID, Google Analytics property, or advertising pixel IDs with bing.com. This data becomes available after batch-crawling the domain database — individual domain lookups cannot populate this section. We extracted the following tracking IDs that can be used for cross-referencing: ga4_id: G-ICON.
Tracking IDs for Cross-Referencing
Related Domains
Related domain data requires database (populated after batch crawl)
bing.com Data Breaches, History, Green Hosting & Mobile Apps
🤖 AI Summary
This section shows additional intelligence about bing.com including data breach history (via HaveIBeenPwned), web archive history (Wayback Machine), green/eco-friendly hosting status, and mobile app presence in the iOS App Store.
✅No Data Breaches Found
This domain has not appeared in any known data breaches.