🌐

1list.org

WordPress
✓ HTTPS ✓ HTTP/2 ✓ Gzip 60.0% ⚡ 2045ms
1list.org Overview

Get a snapshot of 1list.org's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.

1list.org Website Overview & Technology Report

61
Trust Score
Likely Safe
35
Security
Headers: 2/6
2045ms
Response
Slow
2
Technologies
Detected
🤖 AI Analysis

We performed a comprehensive analysis of 1list.org on 2026-06-27. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 2045ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 117 KB, and the site is served behind a CDN (Content Delivery Network). Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 35/100 (below average). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. However, the site is missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 2 technologies across 2 categories powering 1list.org. The detected stack includes WordPress and Google Fonts. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, 1list.org receives an overall trust score of 61/100, classified as "Likely Safe".

Status Code200 OK
HTTP VersionHTTP/2
Serverhcdn
Page Size117 KB
Total Requests109
3rd Party Domains2
SSL CertificateLet's Encrypt
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
IP Address151.106.101.26
1list.org Trust & Safety

Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.

1list.org Trust Score & Safety Analysis

61
Trust Score
35
Security
🤖 Trust Analysis

After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, 1list.org receives a trust score of 61/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit and SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing. Areas of concern include: missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked 1list.org against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.

HTTPS (no HSTS)
+7
SPF
+3
SSL Certificate
−10
Security Headers
−5

Security Headers

Content-Security-Policy✓ Set
HSTS✗ Missing
X-Frame-Options✓ Set
X-Content-Type-Options✗ Missing
Referrer-Policy✗ Missing
Permissions-Policy✗ Missing

Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓

Google Safe Browsing
Phishtank
Urlhaus
Openphish
Dnsfilter
Spamhaus Dbl
Surbl
Virustotal

🔍 Analyze Your Own Website

Check your site's trust score, security headers, tech stack and 50+ metrics — completely free.

Analyze Now →
1list.org Technology Stack 2 detected

Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.

1list.org Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 Stack Analysis

Our technology detection engine scanned 1list.org and identified 2 distinct technologies across 2 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. CMS: WordPress — manages the content and page structure for 1list.org. Fonts: Google Fonts — delivers web fonts for typography for 1list.org.

• CMS
WordPress 95%
🔤 Fonts
Google Fonts 95%
1list.org Performance & Web Vitals

Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for 1list.org.

1list.org Performance & Web Vitals Report

🤖 Performance Analysis

1list.org delivers its homepage in 2045ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 117 KB, and we detected 109 resource requests loading assets from 2 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 1 out of 3 CSS files and 1 out of 1 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 2 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors. From an environmental perspective, each page view of 1list.org produces approximately 0.06g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 117 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for 1list.org. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

Response Time2045ms Slow
Page Size117 KB
CompressionGzip 60.0% savings
CDNNot detected
Carbon / Page View0.06g · Rating A
1list.org DNS & Domain Info

Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.

1list.org DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 DNS Analysis

1list.org resolves to the IPv4 address 151.106.101.26 and also supports IPv6 (2a02:4780:44:c669:bd14:5d4e:be14:dc02), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 2 name servers: ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com. Having 2 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for 1list.org is handled by hostinger.com with 2 MX records configured: mx1.hostinger.com and mx2.hostinger.com. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is not enabled for 1list.org. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 2 active subdomains for 1list.org: ftp.1list.org and www.1list.org. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.

IP Address151.106.101.26
IPv62a02:4780:44:c669:bd14:5d4e:be14:dc02
Nameserversns1.dns-parking.com
MX Providerhostinger.com (mx1.hostinger.com)
SPF✓ Configured
DMARC✗ Not set
DKIM✗ Not found
DNSSEC✗ Not enabled
IPv6✓ Supported
WHOIS Privacy🔒 Private

Subdomains 2 found

ftpwww
1list.org Page Analysis

Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for 1list.org.

1list.org Page Content Analysis

🤖 Content Analysis

The homepage of 1list.org contains 82 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 1 H2 headings, 30 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The page includes 30 images. All images have proper alt text attributes ✓, which is excellent for both accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (search engines can understand image content). The link structure consists of 64 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 0 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 1 external JavaScript files, 3 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), Schema.org structured data (BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, and WebSite), and RSS feed for content syndication. Notable missing features: robots.txt. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility.

Word Count82 words
Images30 total · 100% alt coverage
Internal Links64
External Links0
JS Files1
CSS Files3
1list.org SEO & Content Analysis

Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.

1list.org SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content

🤖 SEO Analysis

The title tag for 1list.org is well-optimized at 60 characters: "1List หนัง x รัสเซีย สาวสวย ผิวขาวโอโม่ หุ่นดี หอยชมพู ขนทอง". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation. The meta description is 155 characters (well-optimized): "รวมคลิปวิดีโอหนัง x รัสเซีย สาวสวย ผิวขาวโอโม่ หุ่นดี สูงยาว เข่าดี หอยชมพู ขนทอง เยสดให้ดูเต็มอารมณ์ ภาพชัด สวย HD ลื่น...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://1list.org/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as th, the meta robots directive is set to index, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1, and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 3/4 recommended fields: OG title ("1List..."), OG description, OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary_large_image is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary_large_image" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type. The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, and WebSite. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates.

Title1List หนัง x รัสเซีย สาวสวย ผิวขาวโอโม่ หุ่นดี หอยชมพู ขนทอง
H11List
Word Count82 words
Images30 total
Internal Links64
External Links0
JS Files1
CSS Files3
Heading StructureH2:1 · H3:30
Meta Robotsindex, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1
X-Powered-ByPHP/8.1.34
MinificationJS: 1/1 minified · CSS: 1/3 minified
Sitemap✓ Found
Robots.txt✗ Not found
Canonical✓ Set
Languageth
Schema.orgBreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, WebSite
Open Graph✓ Complete
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
PWANot detected
RSS Feed✓ Found
AMPNot detected
Carbon / Visit0.06g · Rating A

Google SERP Preview

1List หนัง x รัสเซีย สาวสวย ผิวขาวโอโม่ หุ่นดี หอยชมพู ขนทอง
https://1list.org
รวมคลิปวิดีโอหนัง x รัสเซีย สาวสวย ผิวขาวโอโม่ หุ่นดี สูงยาว เข่าดี หอยชมพู ขนทอง เยสดให้ดูเต็มอารมณ์ ภาพชัด สวย HD ลื่นไหลไม่สะดุด หยิบทิชชูแล้วเริ่มดูได้

META TAGS & SCHEMA.ORG

META TAGS

Title1List หนัง x รัสเซีย สาวสวย ผิวขาวโอโม่ หุ่นดี หอยชมพู ขนทอง
Title Length60 chars Good
Meta Desc Length155 chars Good
H11List
Languageth
Canonical✓ Set
Meta Robotsindex, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1

SCHEMA.ORG & SOCIAL

Schema TypesBreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, SearchAction, WebSite
OG Typewebsite
OG ImageNot set
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
Favicon✓ Found

📊 Compare With Your Competitors

See how your website stacks up against 1list.org in trust, speed, security, and technology.

Compare Now →