🌐

fireship.io

✓ HTTPS ✓ HTTP/2 ✓ Gzip 60.0% ⚡ 37276ms
fireship.io Overview

Get a snapshot of fireship.io's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.

fireship.io Website Overview & Technology Report

59
Trust Score
Caution Advised
20
Security
Headers: 1/6
37276ms
Response
Slow
4
Technologies
Detected
🤖 AI Analysis

The domain fireship.io has raised some red flags, earning a trust score of 59 and a verdict of "Caution Advised". Despite its relatively high page size of 36KB and moderate response time of 37.276 seconds, the site's trustworthiness is a concern. This could be due to the presence of multiple technologies, including Next.js, React, and Webpack, which may indicate a complex architecture.

Status Code200 OK
HTTP VersionHTTP/2
Servercloudflare
Page Size36 KB
Total Requests54
3rd Party Domains8
SSL CertificateGoogle Trust Services
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
IP Address172.67.139.35
fireship.io Trust & Safety

Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.

fireship.io Trust Score & Safety Analysis

59
Trust Score
20
Security
🤖 Trust Analysis

The trust score of 59 is a mixed bag, indicating both positives and negatives. The presence of the "Google Trust Services" SSL issuer and "TLS 1.3" encryption is a significant plus. However, the site's security score of 20 and lack of SPF and DMARC records suggest potential vulnerabilities. The low security score is a major concern, as it may indicate a lack of attention to security best practices.

HTTPS + HSTS
+12
DKIM
+3
SSL Certificate
−10
Security Headers
−5

Security Headers

Content-Security-Policy✗ Missing
HSTS✓ Set
X-Frame-Options✗ Missing
X-Content-Type-Options✗ Missing
Referrer-Policy✗ Missing
Permissions-Policy✗ Missing

Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓

Google Safe Browsing
Phishtank
Urlhaus
Openphish
Dnsfilter
Spamhaus Dbl
Surbl
Virustotal

🔍 Analyze Your Own Website

Check your site's trust score, security headers, tech stack and 50+ metrics — completely free.

Analyze Now →
fireship.io Technology Stack 4 detected

Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.

fireship.io Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 Stack Analysis

The site's tech stack is a notable aspect, with four distinct technologies in use: Next.js, React, Webpack, and Netlify. This combination suggests a robust and scalable architecture. The use of Next.js and React is particularly noteworthy, as these frameworks are well-established and widely used in the JavaScript community. However, the presence of multiple technologies may also increase the complexity of the site and make it more difficult to maintain.

⚛️ Framework
⚛️ UI Library
🔨 Build Tool
🖥️ Hosting
fireship.io Performance & Web Vitals

Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for fireship.io.

fireship.io Performance & Web Vitals Report

🤖 Performance Analysis

fireship.io delivers its homepage in 37276ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 36 KB, and we detected 54 resource requests loading assets from 8 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 1 CSS files and 0 out of 17 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 18 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors. From an environmental perspective, each page view of fireship.io produces approximately 0.02g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 36 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for fireship.io. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

Response Time37276ms Slow
Page Size36 KB
CompressionGzip 60.0% savings
CDNNot detected
Carbon / Page View0.02g · Rating A
fireship.io DNS & Domain Info

Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.

fireship.io DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 DNS Analysis

The site's infrastructure is a mixed bag, with a relatively slow response time of 37.276 seconds. This could be due to a variety of factors, including server load, database performance, or content delivery network issues. The site's IP address, 172.67.139.35, is also noteworthy, as it is not a traditional IP address. This may indicate the use of a content delivery network or load balancer.

IP Address172.67.139.35
IPv62606:4700:3034::6815:570c
Nameserversgraham.ns.cloudflare.com
MX ProviderGoogle Workspace (aspmx.l.google.com)
SPF✗ Not set
DMARC✗ Not set
DKIM✓ Found
DNSSEC✗ Not enabled
IPv6✓ Supported
WHOIS Privacy🔒 Private

Subdomains 1 found

www

TXT Records / Service Verifications 3

Openai ✓ Google ✓ +1 more
fireship.io Page Analysis

Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for fireship.io.

fireship.io Page Content Analysis

🤖 Content Analysis

The homepage of fireship.io contains 264 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 0 H2 headings, 1 H3 headings, 2 H4 headings, 5 H5, and 1 H6 headings. The page includes 9 images. All images have proper alt text attributes ✓, which is excellent for both accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (search engines can understand image content). The link structure consists of 13 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 6 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 17 external JavaScript files, 1 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior). Notable missing features: XML Sitemap and Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. The website has social media presence across 2 platforms: Facebook (@tr) and Youtube (@Fireship). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.

Word Count264 words
Images9 total · 100% alt coverage
Internal Links13
External Links6
JS Files17
CSS Files1

Social Media Presence 2 platforms

📘 Facebook ▶️ Youtube
fireship.io SEO & Content Analysis

Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.

fireship.io SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content

🤖 SEO Analysis

The site's SEO performance is also a concern, with a relatively low word count of 264 and only 9 images. The title of the site, "Fireship | JavaScript, but fun," while creative, may not be particularly SEO-friendly. The lack of meta descriptions, header tags, and other SEO best practices may also hinder the site's search engine visibility. Overall, the site's SEO performance is subpar, and improvements are necessary to improve its online visibility.

TitleFireship | JavaScript, but fun.
H1Brain food fordevelopers
Word Count264 words
Images9 total
Internal Links13
External Links6
JS Files17
CSS Files1
Heading StructureH3:1 · H4:2 · H5:5 · H6:1
Redirect Chainhttps://fireship.iohttps://fireship.dev/
MinificationJS: 0/17 minified · CSS: 0/1 minified
Sitemap✗ Not found
Robots.txt✓ Found
Canonical✓ Set
Language
Open Graph✓ Complete
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
PWANot detected
RSS FeedNot detected
AMPNot detected
Carbon / Visit0.02g · Rating A

Google SERP Preview

Fireship | JavaScript, but fun.
https://fireship.io
We help JavaScript developers make more money - and enjoy themselves in the process.

META TAGS & SCHEMA.ORG

META TAGS

TitleFireship | JavaScript, but fun.
Title Length31 chars Good
Meta Desc Length84 chars Too short
H1Brain food fordevelopers
Language
Canonical✓ Set
Meta Robots

SCHEMA.ORG & SOCIAL

Schema Types
OG Typewebsite
OG Image✓ Set
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
FaviconNot detected

📊 Compare With Your Competitors

See how your website stacks up against fireship.io in trust, speed, security, and technology.

Compare Now →
🛡 Is this your website?

Show visitors your trust score — add a free badge to your site

Trust Score Badge Get Your Badge →