🌐

ping.com

Magento
✓ HTTPS ✓ HTTP/2 Fastly ✓ Gzip 60.0% ⚡ 9663ms Magento
ping.com Overview

Get a snapshot of ping.com's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.

ping.com Website Overview & Technology Report

68
Trust Score
Likely Safe
0
Security
Headers: 0/6
9663ms
Response
Slow
5
Technologies
Detected
🤖 AI Analysis

We performed a comprehensive analysis of ping.com on 2026-06-30. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 9663ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 166 KB. The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by DigiCert Inc (OV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suite and sha256WithRSAEncryption signature algorithm. The certificate covers 1 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2027-01-13, which is 197 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 0/100 (poor). No security headers are configured, which is a significant security concern. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 5 technologies across 5 categories powering ping.com. The detected stack includes Magento, Next.js css, React, Webpack, and Fastly. The primary e-commerce platform is Magento. The site uses Next.js as its primary framework (version css). The UI is built with React. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, ping.com receives an overall trust score of 68/100, classified as "Likely Safe".

Status Code200 OK
HTTP VersionHTTP/2
Server
Page Size166 KB
Total Requests74
3rd Party Domains0
SSL CertificateDigiCert Inc (OV) · 197 days left
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
IP Address150.171.110.21
ping.com Trust & Safety

Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.

ping.com Trust Score & Safety Analysis

68
Trust Score
0
Security
🤖 Trust Analysis

After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, ping.com receives a trust score of 68/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, a valid SSL certificate issued by DigiCert Inc with 197 days until expiration, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, and DMARC email authentication with a reject policy — the strongest available setting. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked ping.com against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.

HTTPS (no HSTS)
+7
SPF + DMARC
+6
SSL Certificate
+7
Security Headers
−5

Security Headers

Content-Security-Policy✗ Missing
HSTS✗ Missing
X-Frame-Options✗ Missing
X-Content-Type-Options✗ Missing
Referrer-Policy✗ Missing
Permissions-Policy✗ Missing

Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓

Google Safe Browsing
Phishtank
Urlhaus
Openphish
Dnsfilter
Spamhaus Dbl
Surbl
Virustotal

Rankings & Estimates

Tranco Rank#95,667 worldwide

🔍 Analyze Your Own Website

Check your site's trust score, security headers, tech stack and 50+ metrics — completely free.

Analyze Now →
ping.com Technology Stack 5 detected

Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.

ping.com Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 Stack Analysis

Our technology detection engine scanned ping.com and identified 5 distinct technologies across 5 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. Ecommerce: Magento — powers the online store and shopping functionality for ping.com. Framework: Next.js (version css) — provides the application framework and routing for ping.com. UI Library: React — handles the user interface rendering and component management for ping.com. Build Tool: Webpack — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for ping.com. CDN: Fastly — accelerates content delivery by caching assets at edge locations worldwide for ping.com.

🛒 Ecommerce
⚛️ Framework
⚛️ UI Library
🔨 Build Tool
☁️ CDN
ping.com Performance & Web Vitals

Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for ping.com.

ping.com Performance & Web Vitals Report

🤖 Performance Analysis

ping.com delivers its homepage in 9663ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 166 KB, and we detected 74 resource requests loading assets from 0 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 6 CSS files and 0 out of 15 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 21 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of ping.com produces approximately 0.08g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 166 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for ping.com. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

Response Time9663ms Slow
Page Size166 KB
CompressionGzip 60.0% savings
CDNFastly ✓ Active
Carbon / Page View0.08g · Rating A
ping.com DNS & Domain Info

Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.

ping.com DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 DNS Analysis

ping.com resolves to the IPv4 address 150.171.110.21 and also supports IPv6 (2603:1061:14:116::1), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 3 name servers: dns1.easydns.com, dns2.easydns.net, and dns3.easydns.org. Having 3 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for ping.com is handled by Microsoft 365 with 1 MX records configured: ping-com.mail.protection.outlook.com. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a reject policy — the strongest setting, instructing receiving servers to reject unauthorized emails entirely. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is not enabled for ping.com. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions.

IP Address150.171.110.21
IPv62603:1061:14:116::1
Nameserversdns1.easydns.com
MX ProviderMicrosoft 365 (ping-com.mail.protection.outlook.com)
SPF✓ Configured
DMARC✓ reject
DMARC Recordv=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:32286c5eb8@rua.easydmarc.us; ruf=mailto:32286c5eb8@ruf.easydmarc.us;
DKIM✗ Not found
DNSSEC✗ Not enabled
IPv6✓ Supported
WHOIS Privacy🔒 Private

TXT Records / Service Verifications 36

Atlassian ✓ Facebook ✓ Google ✓ Apple ✓ +32 more
ping.com Page Analysis

Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for ping.com.

ping.com Page Content Analysis

🤖 Content Analysis

The homepage of ping.com contains 25 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 0 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The link structure consists of 3 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 0 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 15 external JavaScript files, 6 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior), Schema.org structured data (BreadcrumbList and ListItem), and Progressive Web App (PWA) manifest (enabling app-like installation). We detected the following payment methods accepted on ping.com: Discover and Apple Pay. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates.

Word Count25 words
Images0 total · 100% alt coverage
Internal Links3
External Links0
JS Files15
CSS Files6

Payment Methods

💳 Discover 💳 Apple Pay
ping.com SEO & Content Analysis

Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.

ping.com SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content

🤖 SEO Analysis

The title tag for ping.com is well-optimized at 43 characters: "Golf Clubs, Golf Bags, and Equipment | PING". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation. The meta description is 155 characters (well-optimized): "Learn more about PING's latest clubs including the G440 Family, i530 & i240 Irons, Scottsdale Putters, and more. Play Yo...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://ping.com/en-us, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as en-us, the meta robots directive is set to index,follow, and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 2/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Golf Clubs, Golf Bags, and Equipment | PING..."), OG description, These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type. The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: BreadcrumbList and ListItem. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates.

TitleGolf Clubs, Golf Bags, and Equipment | PING
H1
Word Count25 words
Images0 total
Internal Links3
External Links0
JS Files15
CSS Files6
Meta Robotsindex,follow
Redirect Chainhttps://ping.comhttps://ping.com/en-us
X-Powered-ByNext.js
MinificationJS: 0/15 minified · CSS: 0/6 minified
Sitemap✓ Found
Robots.txt✓ Found
Canonical✓ Set
Languageen-us
Schema.orgBreadcrumbList, ListItem
Open Graph✓ Complete
Twitter Card✓ summary
PWA✓ Manifest found
RSS FeedNot detected
AMPNot detected
Carbon / Visit0.08g · Rating A

Google SERP Preview

Golf Clubs, Golf Bags, and Equipment | PING
https://ping.com
Learn more about PING's latest clubs including the G440 Family, i530 & i240 Irons, Scottsdale Putters, and more. Play Your Best with PING custom-fit clubs.

META TAGS & SCHEMA.ORG

META TAGS

TitleGolf Clubs, Golf Bags, and Equipment | PING
Title Length43 chars Good
Meta Desc Length155 chars Good
H1
Languageen-us
Canonical✓ Set
Meta Robotsindex,follow

SCHEMA.ORG & SOCIAL

Schema TypesBreadcrumbList, ListItem
OG Type
OG ImageNot set
Twitter Card✓ summary
Favicon✓ Found

📊 Compare With Your Competitors

See how your website stacks up against ping.com in trust, speed, security, and technology.

Compare Now →
🛡 Is this your website?

Show visitors your trust score — add a free badge to your site

Trust Score Badge Get Your Badge →