Get a snapshot of safety.google's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.
safety.google Website Overview & Technology Report
We performed a comprehensive analysis of safety.google on 2026-06-29. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 51110ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 187 KB. The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by Google Trust Services (DV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suite and ECDSA-SHA256 signature algorithm. The certificate covers 2 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-09-07, which is 70 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 35/100 (below average). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options. However, the site is missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 3 technologies across 3 categories powering safety.google. The detected stack includes Webpack, Google Tag Manager, and Google Fonts. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, safety.google receives an overall trust score of 73/100, classified as "Likely Safe".
Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.
safety.google Trust Score & Safety Analysis
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, safety.google receives a trust score of 73/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, a valid SSL certificate issued by Google Trust Services with 70 days until expiration, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a none policy, and DNSSEC providing authenticated DNS responses. Areas of concern include: no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, and the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked safety.google against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Security Headers
Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓
Rankings & Estimates
Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.
safety.google Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
Our technology detection engine scanned safety.google and identified 3 distinct technologies across 3 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. Build Tool: Webpack — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for safety.google. Tag Manager: Google Tag Manager — manages marketing and analytics tags without code changes for safety.google. Fonts: Google Fonts — delivers web fonts for typography for safety.google. We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Tag Manager container GTM-TKBHP5ZJ. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.
Tracking IDs Detected
Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for safety.google.
safety.google Performance & Web Vitals Report
safety.google delivers its homepage in 51110ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 187 KB, and we detected 243 resource requests loading assets from 17 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 2 out of 4 CSS files and 2 out of 3 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 3 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of safety.google produces approximately 0.09g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 187 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for safety.google. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.
safety.google DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
safety.google resolves to the IPv4 address 216.239.32.29 and also supports IPv6 (2001:4860:4802:32::1d), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 4 name servers: ns1.zdns.google, ns2.zdns.google, ns3.zdns.google, and ns4.zdns.google. Having 4 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a none policy — a monitoring-only setting that doesn't enforce any action on unauthorized emails. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is enabled for safety.google, providing an additional layer of security by cryptographically signing DNS records. This prevents DNS cache poisoning and man-in-the-middle attacks that could redirect visitors to malicious websites.
Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for safety.google.
safety.google Page Content Analysis
The homepage of safety.google contains 1,247 words of visible text content. This is a substantial amount of content that provides good opportunities for search engine indexing. The page is structured with 6 H2 headings, 9 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings, 0 H5, and 4 H6 headings. The page includes 55 images. 40 images (73%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 27% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images. The link structure consists of 81 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 19 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 3 external JavaScript files, 4 CSS stylesheets, and 1 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior), Schema.org structured data (ImageObject, Organization, and WebPage), and RSS feed for content syndication. We detected the following payment methods accepted on safety.google: Discover and Google Pay. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates. The website has social media presence across 4 platforms: Facebook (@Google), Twitter (@google), Instagram (@google), and Linkedin (@google). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.
Payment Methods
Social Media Presence 4 platforms
Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.
safety.google SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content
The title tag for safety.google is good at 61 characters: "Control Your Online Safety and Privacy - Google Safety Center". The length is acceptable, though it may be slightly truncated in some search result displays.
The meta description is 149 characters (well-optimized): "When searching on Google, your online safety and privacy are essential. Explore how Google helps you browse safely and p...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results.
The canonical url is correctly set to https://safety.google/intl/en/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as all, and a favicon is configured.
Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Control Your Online Safety and Privacy - Google Safety Cente..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol.
A Twitter Card of type summary_large_image is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary_large_image" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type.
The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: ImageObject, Organization, and WebPage. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates.