Get a snapshot of systemrequirementslab.com's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.
systemrequirementslab.com Website Overview & Technology Report
We performed a comprehensive analysis of systemrequirementslab.com on 2026-06-28. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 25519ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 87 KB. Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 0/100 (poor). No security headers are configured, which is a significant security concern. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 2 technologies across 2 categories powering systemrequirementslab.com. The detected stack includes Bootstrap 5.0.2 and Google Tag Manager. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, systemrequirementslab.com receives an overall trust score of 55/100, classified as "Caution Advised".
Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.
systemrequirementslab.com Trust Score & Safety Analysis
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, systemrequirementslab.com receives a trust score of 55/100, which places it in the "Caution Advised" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) providing cryptographic email verification. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked systemrequirementslab.com against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Security Headers
Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓
Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.
systemrequirementslab.com Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
Our technology detection engine scanned systemrequirementslab.com and identified 2 distinct technologies across 2 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. CSS Framework: Bootstrap (version 5.0.2) — provides the styling and responsive layout system for systemrequirementslab.com. Tag Manager: Google Tag Manager — manages marketing and analytics tags without code changes for systemrequirementslab.com. We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Tag Manager container GTM-W3XGXX2. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.
Tracking IDs Detected
Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.
systemrequirementslab.com DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
systemrequirementslab.com resolves to the IPv4 address 3.212.13.228, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 4 name servers: ns-1527.awsdns-62.org, ns-1713.awsdns-22.co.uk, ns-77.awsdns-09.com, and ns-800.awsdns-36.net. Having 4 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for systemrequirementslab.com is handled by oxcs.net with 4 MX records configured: mx001.netsol.xion.oxcs.net, mx002.netsol.xion.oxcs.net, and mx003.netsol.xion.oxcs.net and 1 more. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF is not configured, meaning any server could potentially send emails pretending to be from this domain. This is a significant email security concern. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) is configured, adding a cryptographic signature to outgoing emails that receiving servers can verify to confirm the email hasn't been tampered with in transit. DNSSEC is not enabled for systemrequirementslab.com. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 5 active subdomains for systemrequirementslab.com: cdn.systemrequirementslab.com, docs.systemrequirementslab.com, mail.systemrequirementslab.com, smtp.systemrequirementslab.com, and www.systemrequirementslab.com. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
Subdomains 5 found
TXT Records / Service Verifications 1
Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.
systemrequirementslab.com SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content
The title tag for systemrequirementslab.com is well-optimized at 48 characters: "Can You RUN It | Can I Run It | Can My PC Run It". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation.
The meta description is 97 characters (well-optimized): "What games will run on my computer? Test my computer for multiple game requirements at one time. ". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results.
The canonical url is correctly set to https://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as en, and a favicon is configured.
Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Requirements Test..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol.
The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: CreativeWork, Thing, and WebApplication. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates.
The meta keywords tag contains 9 terms including can I run it, can you run it, game system requirements, validate computer, and minimum requirements. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.
Payment Methods
Other domains that share the same tracking IDs, IP address, or analytics properties with systemrequirementslab.com.