Get a snapshot of torbox.app's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.
torbox.app Website Overview & Technology Report
We performed a comprehensive analysis of torbox.app on 2026-06-29. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 29681ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 2 KB, and the site is served behind a CDN (Content Delivery Network). The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by Google Trust Services (DV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suite and ECDSA-SHA256 signature algorithm. The certificate covers 1 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-08-29, which is 61 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 30/100 (below average). The following security headers are properly configured: X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 1 technologies across 1 categories powering torbox.app. The detected stack includes Cloudflare. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, torbox.app receives an overall trust score of 73/100, classified as "Likely Safe".
Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.
torbox.app Trust Score & Safety Analysis
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, torbox.app receives a trust score of 73/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, a valid SSL certificate issued by Google Trust Services with 61 days until expiration, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a quarantine policy, and DNSSEC providing authenticated DNS responses. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), and the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked torbox.app against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Security Headers
Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓
Rankings & Estimates
Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.
torbox.app Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
Our technology detection engine scanned torbox.app and identified 1 distinct technologies across 1 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. CDN: Cloudflare — accelerates content delivery by caching assets at edge locations worldwide for torbox.app.
Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for torbox.app.
torbox.app Performance & Web Vitals Report
torbox.app delivers its homepage in 29681ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 2 KB, and we detected 11 resource requests loading assets from 2 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 1 CSS files and 1 out of 5 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 5 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors. From an environmental perspective, each page view of torbox.app produces approximately 0.0g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 2 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for torbox.app. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.
torbox.app DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
torbox.app resolves to the IPv4 address 104.20.28.56 and also supports IPv6 (2606:4700:10::6814:1c38), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 2 name servers: chip.ns.cloudflare.com and leanna.ns.cloudflare.com. Having 2 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for torbox.app is handled by ik2.com with 2 MX records configured: 2b6caf91.21.ik2.com and 2b6caf91.22.ik2.io. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a quarantine policy — a moderate setting, directing unauthorized emails to spam/junk folders. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is enabled for torbox.app, providing an additional layer of security by cryptographically signing DNS records. This prevents DNS cache poisoning and man-in-the-middle attacks that could redirect visitors to malicious websites.
TXT Records / Service Verifications 11
Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for torbox.app.
torbox.app Page Content Analysis
The homepage of torbox.app contains 3 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 0 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The link structure consists of 0 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 0 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 5 external JavaScript files, 1 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior), and Progressive Web App (PWA) manifest (enabling app-like installation). Notable missing features: Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility.
Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.
torbox.app SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content
The title tag for torbox.app is good at 23 characters: "TorBox: Premium Hosting". The length is acceptable, though it may be slightly truncated in some search result displays. The meta description is 61 characters (acceptable): "TorBox: Fast, secure, high-speed, modern and easy for anyone.". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The page language is declared as en and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("TorBox.app..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. The meta keywords tag contains 14 terms including torbox, torbox mobile, seedbox services, real debrid, and premium debrid. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.