Get a snapshot of torproject.org's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.
torproject.org Website Overview & Technology Report
We performed a comprehensive analysis of torproject.org on 2026-06-29. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 8208ms. The page is served over HTTP/1.1 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 22 KB. The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by Let's Encrypt (DV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suite and sha256WithRSAEncryption signature algorithm. The certificate covers 1 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-08-24, which is 56 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 85/100 (good). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy. However, the site is missing Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 3 technologies across 3 categories powering torproject.org. The detected stack includes Bootstrap, jQuery 3.2.1., and Font Awesome. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, torproject.org receives an overall trust score of 82/100, classified as "Very Likely Safe".
Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.
torproject.org Trust Score & Safety Analysis
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, torproject.org receives a trust score of 82/100, which places it in the "Very Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) enforcement preventing protocol downgrade attacks, a valid SSL certificate issued by Let's Encrypt with 56 days until expiration, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a none policy, and DNSSEC providing authenticated DNS responses. Areas of concern include: the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked torproject.org against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Security Headers
Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓
Rankings & Estimates
Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.
torproject.org Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
Our technology detection engine scanned torproject.org and identified 3 distinct technologies across 3 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. CSS Framework: Bootstrap — provides the styling and responsive layout system for torproject.org. JavaScript Library: jQuery (version 3.2.1.) — provides utility functions and DOM manipulation for torproject.org. Icon Set: Font Awesome — provides additional functionality for torproject.org.
Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for torproject.org.
torproject.org Performance & Web Vitals Report
torproject.org delivers its homepage in 8208ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 22 KB, and we detected 100 resource requests loading assets from 7 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 1 out of 2 CSS files and 4 out of 7 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 4 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of torproject.org produces approximately 0.01g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 22 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for torproject.org. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.
torproject.org DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
torproject.org resolves to the IPv4 address 204.8.99.144 and also supports IPv6 (2a01:4f8:fff0:4f:266:37ff:fe2c:5d19), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 5 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 6 name servers: ns1.torproject.org, ns2.torproject.org, ns3.torproject.org, ns4.torproject.org, ns5.torproject.org, and nsp.dnsnode.net. Having 6 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for torproject.org is handled by torproject.org with 1 MX records configured: mx-dal-01.torproject.org. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a none policy — a monitoring-only setting that doesn't enforce any action on unauthorized emails. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is enabled for torproject.org, providing an additional layer of security by cryptographically signing DNS records. This prevents DNS cache poisoning and man-in-the-middle attacks that could redirect visitors to malicious websites.
TXT Records / Service Verifications 3
Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for torproject.org.
torproject.org Page Content Analysis
The homepage of torproject.org contains 420 words of visible text content. This is a moderate amount of content. The page is structured with 1 H2 headings, 1 H3 headings, 14 H4 headings, 1 H5, and 1 H6 headings. The page includes 7 images. 1 images (14%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 86% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images. The link structure consists of 64 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 18 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 7 external JavaScript files, 2 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior). Notable missing features: XML Sitemap and Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. The website has social media presence across 5 platforms: Facebook (@TorProject), Twitter (@torproject), Instagram (@torproject), Linkedin (@tor-project), and Github (@torproject). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.
Social Media Presence 5 platforms
Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.
torproject.org SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content
The title tag for torproject.org is well-optimized at 30 characters: "Tor Project | Anonymity Online". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation. The meta description is 92 characters (well-optimized): "Anonymity Online | Defend yourself against tracking and surveillance. Circumvent censorship.". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The page language is declared as en and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 3/4 recommended fields: OG title ("The Tor Project | Privacy & Freedom Online..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type.