Get a snapshot of umd.edu's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.
umd.edu Website Overview & Technology Report
We performed a comprehensive analysis of umd.edu on 2026-06-28. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 5441ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 73 KB, and the site is served behind a CDN (Content Delivery Network). Warning: The website does not have a valid SSL certificate. Visitors may see security warnings in their browser, and data transmitted to and from this website is not encrypted. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 50/100 (moderate). The following security headers are properly configured: Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 1 technologies across 1 categories powering umd.edu. The detected stack includes Amazon CloudFront. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, umd.edu receives an overall trust score of 70/100, classified as "Likely Safe".
Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.
umd.edu Trust Score & Safety Analysis
After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, umd.edu receives a trust score of 70/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) enforcement preventing protocol downgrade attacks, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a none policy, and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) providing cryptographic email verification. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked umd.edu against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.
Security Headers
Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓
Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.
umd.edu Technology Stack & Detected Technologies
Our technology detection engine scanned umd.edu and identified 1 distinct technologies across 1 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. CDN: Amazon CloudFront — accelerates content delivery by caching assets at edge locations worldwide for umd.edu.
Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for umd.edu.
umd.edu Performance & Web Vitals Report
umd.edu delivers its homepage in 5441ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 73 KB, and we detected 119 resource requests loading assets from 9 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 2 CSS files and 0 out of 3 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 5 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors. From an environmental perspective, each page view of umd.edu produces approximately 0.04g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 73 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for umd.edu. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.
Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.
umd.edu DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration
umd.edu resolves to the IPv4 address 94.247.142.1, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 3 name servers: ns.ums.edu, ns1.umd.edu, and ns2.umd.edu. Having 3 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for umd.edu is handled by iphmx.com with 2 MX records configured: mx1.umd.iphmx.com and mx2.umd.iphmx.com. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a none policy — a monitoring-only setting that doesn't enforce any action on unauthorized emails. DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) is configured, adding a cryptographic signature to outgoing emails that receiving servers can verify to confirm the email hasn't been tampered with in transit. DNSSEC is not enabled for umd.edu. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 13 active subdomains for umd.edu: admin.umd.edu, app.umd.edu, blog.umd.edu, help.umd.edu, mail.umd.edu, partners.umd.edu, shop.umd.edu, and smtp.umd.edu. Plus 5 additional subdomains. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.
Subdomains 13 found
TXT Records / Service Verifications 74
Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for umd.edu.
umd.edu Page Content Analysis
The homepage of umd.edu contains 714 words of visible text content. This is a moderate amount of content. The page is structured with 8 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The page includes 14 images. All images have proper alt text attributes ✓, which is excellent for both accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (search engines can understand image content). The link structure consists of 53 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 38 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 3 external JavaScript files, 2 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), Schema.org structured data (BreadcrumbList, CollegeOrUniversity, ImageObject, ListItem, and WebPage), and Progressive Web App (PWA) manifest (enabling app-like installation). Notable missing features: robots.txt. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. We detected the following payment methods accepted on umd.edu: Discover. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates. The website has social media presence across 3 platforms: Facebook (@UnivofMaryland), Twitter (@UofMaryland), and Instagram (@univofmaryland). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.
Payment Methods
Social Media Presence 3 platforms
Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.
umd.edu SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content
The title tag for umd.edu is well-optimized at 51 characters: "Our Research Changes Lives | University of Maryland". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation.
The meta description is 151 characters (well-optimized): "At UMD, brilliant scholars and scientists come together to spark new ideas, pursue important discoveries, drive innovati...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results.
The canonical url is correctly set to https://umd.edu/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as en, the meta robots directive is set to all, and a favicon is configured.
Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Our Research Changes Lives | University of Maryland..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol.
A Twitter Card of type summary is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type.
The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: BreadcrumbList, CollegeOrUniversity, ImageObject, ListItem, and WebPage. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates.
The meta keywords tag contains 1 terms including A Preeminent Public Research University. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.