🌐

verisign.net

✓ HTTPS ✓ HTTP/2 ⚡ 41355ms
verisign.net Overview

Get a snapshot of verisign.net's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.

verisign.net Website Overview & Technology Report

79
Trust Score
Likely Safe
85
Security
Headers: 5/6
41355ms
Response
Slow
0
Technologies
Detected
🤖 AI Analysis

We performed a comprehensive analysis of verisign.net on 2026-06-29. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 41355ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol, however no compression (Gzip or Brotli) is enabled, which means the page is transferred at its full uncompressed size. The total page weight is 120 KB, and the site is served behind a CDN (Content Delivery Network). The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by DigiCert Inc (OV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suite and sha256WithRSAEncryption signature algorithm. The certificate covers 67 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-11-25, which is 149 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 85/100 (good). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy. However, the site is missing Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, verisign.net receives an overall trust score of 79/100, classified as "Likely Safe".

Status Code200 OK
HTTP VersionHTTP/2
ServerAmazonS3
Page Size120 KB
Total Requests207
3rd Party Domains16
SSL CertificateDigiCert Inc (OV) · 149 days left
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
IP Address69.58.187.40
verisign.net Trust & Safety

Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.

verisign.net Trust Score & Safety Analysis

79
Trust Score
85
Security
🤖 Trust Analysis

After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, verisign.net receives a trust score of 79/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) enforcement preventing protocol downgrade attacks, a valid SSL certificate issued by DigiCert Inc with 149 days until expiration, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, and DNSSEC providing authenticated DNS responses. Areas of concern include: the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked verisign.net against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.

HTTPS + HSTS
+12
SPF
+3
SSL Certificate
+7
Security Headers
+8

Security Headers

Content-Security-Policy✓ Set
HSTS✓ Set
X-Frame-Options✓ Set
X-Content-Type-Options✓ Set
Referrer-Policy✓ Set
Permissions-Policy✗ Missing

Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓

Google Safe Browsing
Phishtank
Urlhaus
Openphish
Dnsfilter
Spamhaus Dbl
Surbl
Virustotal

Rankings & Estimates

Tranco Rank#4,848 worldwide

🔍 Analyze Your Own Website

Check your site's trust score, security headers, tech stack and 50+ metrics — completely free.

Analyze Now →
verisign.net Technology Stack 0 detected

Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.

verisign.net Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 Stack Analysis

Our automated technology detection scan was unable to identify specific technologies on verisign.net. This could indicate that the site uses server-side rendering without client-side technology fingerprints, employs aggressive code obfuscation, or uses custom-built solutions that don't match known technology signatures.

verisign.net Performance & Web Vitals

Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for verisign.net.

verisign.net Performance & Web Vitals Report

🤖 Performance Analysis

verisign.net delivers its homepage in 41355ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 120 KB, and we detected 207 resource requests loading assets from 16 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. No compression is currently enabled on verisign.net. Enabling Brotli or Gzip compression could reduce page size by 60-80% for text-based assets (HTML, CSS, JavaScript), significantly improving load times and reducing bandwidth costs. This is one of the simplest and most impactful performance optimizations available. Asset minification status: 0 out of 1 CSS files and 1 out of 3 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 3 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. The site is served through a Content Delivery Network (CDN), which caches static assets at edge servers around the world. This means visitors from different geographic regions receive content from the nearest edge server, significantly reducing latency. CDN usage is particularly important for websites with a global audience, as it can reduce page load times by 40-60% for distant visitors. From an environmental perspective, each page view of verisign.net produces approximately 0.06g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 120 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for verisign.net. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

Response Time41355ms Slow
Page Size120 KB
CompressionNot detected
CDNNot detected
Carbon / Page View0.06g · Rating A
verisign.net DNS & Domain Info

Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.

verisign.net DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 DNS Analysis

verisign.net resolves to the IPv4 address 69.58.187.40 and also supports IPv6 (2620:74:14:3000::40), demonstrating modern network infrastructure readiness. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 4 name servers: av1.nstld.com, av2.nstld.com, av3.nstld.com, and av4.nstld.com. Having 4 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for verisign.net is handled by verisign.com with 6 MX records configured: mail1.verisign.com, mail2.verisign.com, and mail3.verisign.com and 3 more. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is enabled for verisign.net, providing an additional layer of security by cryptographically signing DNS records. This prevents DNS cache poisoning and man-in-the-middle attacks that could redirect visitors to malicious websites.

IP Address69.58.187.40
IPv62620:74:14:3000::40
Nameserversav1.nstld.com
MX Providerverisign.com (mail1.verisign.com)
SPF✓ Configured
DMARC✗ Not set
DKIM✗ Not found
DNSSEC✓ Enabled
IPv6✓ Supported
WHOIS Privacy🔒 Private

TXT Records / Service Verifications 2

Google ✓ +1 more
verisign.net Page Analysis

Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for verisign.net.

verisign.net Page Content Analysis

🤖 Content Analysis

The homepage of verisign.net contains 672 words of visible text content. This is a moderate amount of content. The page is structured with 4 H2 headings, 19 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The page includes 10 images. All images have proper alt text attributes ✓, which is excellent for both accessibility (screen readers) and SEO (search engines can understand image content). The link structure consists of 128 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 33 external links pointing to third-party websites. The high number of internal links suggests a well-interconnected site structure, which helps search engines discover and crawl all pages efficiently. There are 3 external JavaScript files, 1 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior). Notable missing features: XML Sitemap and Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. We detected the following payment methods accepted on verisign.net: Discover. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates. The website has social media presence across 3 platforms: Facebook (@Verisign), Twitter (@Verisign), and Linkedin (@Verisign). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.

Word Count672 words
Images10 total · 100% alt coverage
Internal Links128
External Links33
JS Files3
CSS Files1

Payment Methods

💳 Discover

Social Media Presence 3 platforms

📘 Facebook 𝕏 Twitter 💼 Linkedin
verisign.net SEO & Content Analysis

Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.

verisign.net SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content

🤖 SEO Analysis

The title tag for verisign.net is too long at 89 characters: "A global provider of domain name registry services and internet infrastructure |...". At 89 characters, the title will likely be truncated in Google search results (recommended: 50-60 characters). Consider shortening it while keeping the most important keywords at the beginning. The meta description is 171 characters (slightly long): "Verisign, a global provider of domain name registry services and internet infrastructure, enables internet navigation fo...". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://www.verisign.com/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as en-us, and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("A global provider of domain name registry services and inter..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type. The meta keywords tag contains 2 terms including Verisign and domain name registry. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.

TitleA global provider of domain name registry services and inter
H1
Word Count672 words
Images10 total
Internal Links128
External Links33
JS Files3
CSS Files1
Heading StructureH2:4 · H3:19
Redirect Chainhttps://verisign.nethttps://www.verisign.com/
MinificationJS: 1/3 minified · CSS: 0/1 minified
Sitemap✗ Not found
Robots.txt✓ Found
Canonical✓ Set
Languageen-us
Open Graph✓ Complete
Twitter Card✓ summary
PWANot detected
RSS FeedNot detected
AMPNot detected
Carbon / Visit0.06g · Rating A

Google SERP Preview

A global provider of domain name registry services and inter
https://verisign.net
Verisign, a global provider of domain name registry services and internet infrastructure, enables internet navigation for many of the world’s most recognized do

META TAGS & SCHEMA.ORG

META TAGS

TitleA global provider of domain name registry services and inter
Title Length89 chars Too long
Meta Desc Length171 chars Too long
H1
Languageen-us
Canonical✓ Set
Meta Robots

SCHEMA.ORG & SOCIAL

Schema Types
OG Typewebsite
OG Image✓ Set
Twitter Card✓ summary
Favicon✓ Found

📊 Compare With Your Competitors

See how your website stacks up against verisign.net in trust, speed, security, and technology.

Compare Now →