🌐

custody.ru

✓ HTTPS ✓ HTTP/2 ⚡ 21020ms
custody.ru Overview

Get a snapshot of custody.ru's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.

custody.ru Website Overview & Technology Report

68
Trust Score
Likely Safe
35
Security
Headers: 2/6
21020ms
Response
Slow
3
Technologies
Detected
🤖 AI Analysis

We performed a comprehensive analysis of custody.ru on 2026-07-01. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 21020ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol, however no compression (Gzip or Brotli) is enabled, which means the page is transferred at its full uncompressed size. The total page weight is 1091 KB. The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by Hellenic Academic and Research Institutions CA (DV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite and sha256WithRSAEncryption signature algorithm. The certificate covers 2 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-12-28, which is 180 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 35/100 (below average). The following security headers are properly configured: Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. However, the site is missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 3 technologies across 2 categories powering custody.ru. The detected stack includes React, Webpack, and Vite. The UI is built with React. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, custody.ru receives an overall trust score of 68/100, classified as "Likely Safe".

Status Code200 OK
HTTP VersionHTTP/2
Serveristio-envoy
Page Size1091 KB
Total Requests90
3rd Party Domains5
SSL CertificateHellenic Academic and Research Institutions CA (DV) · 180 days left
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
IP Address178.130.128.39
custody.ru Trust & Safety

Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.

custody.ru Trust Score & Safety Analysis

68
Trust Score
35
Security
🤖 Trust Analysis

After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, custody.ru receives a trust score of 68/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, a valid SSL certificate issued by Hellenic Academic and Research Institutions CA with 180 days until expiration, and SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing. Areas of concern include: missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked custody.ru against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.

HTTPS (no HSTS)
+7
SPF
+3
SSL Certificate
+7
Security Headers
−5

Security Headers

Content-Security-Policy✓ Set
HSTS✗ Missing
X-Frame-Options✓ Set
X-Content-Type-Options✗ Missing
Referrer-Policy✗ Missing
Permissions-Policy✗ Missing

Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓

Google Safe Browsing
Phishtank
Urlhaus
Openphish
Dnsfilter
Spamhaus Dbl
Surbl
Virustotal

Rankings & Estimates

Tranco Rank#204,823 worldwide

🔍 Analyze Your Own Website

Check your site's trust score, security headers, tech stack and 50+ metrics — completely free.

Analyze Now →
custody.ru Technology Stack 3 detected

Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.

custody.ru Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 Stack Analysis

Our technology detection engine scanned custody.ru and identified 3 distinct technologies across 2 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. UI Library: React — handles the user interface rendering and component management for custody.ru. Build Tool: Webpack and Vite — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for custody.ru.

⚛️ UI Library
🔨 Build Tool
custody.ru Performance & Web Vitals

Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for custody.ru.

custody.ru Performance & Web Vitals Report

🤖 Performance Analysis

custody.ru delivers its homepage in 21020ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 1091 KB, and we detected 90 resource requests loading assets from 5 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. No compression is currently enabled on custody.ru. Enabling Brotli or Gzip compression could reduce page size by 60-80% for text-based assets (HTML, CSS, JavaScript), significantly improving load times and reducing bandwidth costs. This is one of the simplest and most impactful performance optimizations available. Asset minification status: 1 out of 13 CSS files and 0 out of 13 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 25 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of custody.ru produces approximately 0.53g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of D. The website's carbon footprint could be reduced by optimizing images, enabling compression, reducing third-party scripts, and leveraging caching. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 1091 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for custody.ru. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

Response Time21020ms Slow
Page Size1091 KB
CompressionNot detected
CDNNot detected
Carbon / Page View0.53g · Rating D
custody.ru DNS & Domain Info

Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.

custody.ru DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 DNS Analysis

custody.ru resolves to the IPv4 address 178.130.128.39, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 1 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 4 name servers: ns1.custody.ru, ns2.custody.ru, ns4-l2.nic.ru, and ns8-l2.nic.ru. Having 4 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for custody.ru is handled by tbank.ru with 1 MX records configured: mxs.tbank.ru. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is not enabled for custody.ru. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 1 active subdomains for custody.ru: www.custody.ru. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.

IP Address178.130.128.39
ASNAS43399 · "TBANK" JSC
LocationMoscow, RU
Nameserversns1.custody.ru
MX Providertbank.ru (mxs.tbank.ru)
CountryRU
SPF✓ Configured
DMARC✗ Not set
DKIM✗ Not found
DNSSEC✗ Not enabled
IPv6Not detected
WHOIS Privacy🔒 Private

Subdomains 1 found

www
custody.ru Page Analysis

Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for custody.ru.

custody.ru Page Content Analysis

🤖 Content Analysis

The homepage of custody.ru contains 196 words of visible text content. This is a relatively short page — adding more descriptive content could improve search engine visibility. The page is structured with 3 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 3 H4 headings. The page includes 9 images. 8 images (89%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 11% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images. The link structure consists of 37 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 3 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 13 external JavaScript files, 13 CSS stylesheets, and 0 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: Progressive Web App (PWA) manifest (enabling app-like installation). Notable missing features: XML Sitemap, robots.txt, and Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. We detected the following payment methods accepted on custody.ru: JCB. Offering multiple payment options including credit cards and digital wallets improves customer trust and can increase conversion rates.

Word Count196 words
Images9 total · 8 missing alt · 11% alt coverage
Internal Links37
External Links3
JS Files13
CSS Files13

Payment Methods

💳 JCB
custody.ru SEO & Content Analysis

Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.

custody.ru SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content

🤖 SEO Analysis

The title tag for custody.ru is good at 62 characters: "Кастодиальные услуги и расчеты по операциям с ценными бумагами". The length is acceptable, though it may be slightly truncated in some search result displays. The meta description is 53 characters (acceptable): "Оказываем услуги на российском и международных рынках". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://custody.ru/, preventing duplicate content issues, the page language is declared as ru, the meta robots directive is set to all, and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("Кастодиальные услуги и расчеты по операциям с ценными бумага..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary_large_image is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary_large_image" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type. The meta keywords tag contains 6 terms including депозитарные услуги, услуги депозитария, депозиторий, оказание депозитарных услуг, and депозит. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.

TitleКастодиальные услуги и расчеты по операциям с ценными бумага
H1
Word Count196 words
Images9 total · 8 missing alt
Internal Links37
External Links3
JS Files13
CSS Files13
Heading StructureH2:3 · H4:3
Meta Robotsall
MinificationJS: 0/13 minified · CSS: 1/13 minified
Sitemap✗ Not found
Robots.txt✗ Not found
Canonical✓ Set
Languageru
Open Graph✓ Complete
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
PWA✓ Manifest found
RSS FeedNot detected
AMPNot detected
Carbon / Visit0.53g · Rating D

Google SERP Preview

Кастодиальные услуги и расчеты по операциям с ценными бумага
https://custody.ru
Оказываем услуги на российском и международных рынках

META TAGS & SCHEMA.ORG

META TAGS

TitleКастодиальные услуги и расчеты по операциям с ценными бумага
Title Length62 chars Too long
Meta Desc Length53 chars Too short
H1
Languageru
Canonical✓ Set
Meta Robotsall

SCHEMA.ORG & SOCIAL

Schema Types
OG Typewebsite
OG Image✓ Set
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
Favicon✓ Found

📊 Compare With Your Competitors

See how your website stacks up against custody.ru in trust, speed, security, and technology.

Compare Now →
🛡 Is this your website?

Show visitors your trust score — add a free badge to your site

Trust Score Badge Get Your Badge →