mangoboard.net

We performed a comprehensive analysis of mangoboard.net on 2026-07-07. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 23530ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol, however no compression (Gzip or Brotli) is enabled, which means the page is transferred at its full uncompressed size. The total page weight is 96 KB. The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by DigiCert Inc (OV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 cipher suite and sha256WithRSAEncryption signature algorithm. The certificate covers 2 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-07-16, which is 9 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 0/100 (poor). No security headers are configured, which is a significant security concern. However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 8 technologies across 7 categories powering mangoboard.net. The detected stack includes Vue.js, Vite, Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Google Fonts, and jQuery 1.11.1.. The UI is built with Vue.js. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, mangoboard.net receives an overall trust score of 61/100, classified as "Likely Safe".

After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, mangoboard.net receives a trust score of 61/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, a valid SSL certificate issued by DigiCert Inc with 9 days until expiration, and SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked mangoboard.net against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers.

Our technology detection engine scanned mangoboard.net and identified 8 distinct technologies across 7 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. UI Library: Vue.js — handles the user interface rendering and component management for mangoboard.net. Build Tool: Vite — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for mangoboard.net. Analytics: Google Analytics 4 and Microsoft Clarity — tracks visitor behavior and provides traffic insights for mangoboard.net. Tag Manager: Google Tag Manager — manages marketing and analytics tags without code changes for mangoboard.net. Advertising: Meta Pixel — handles advertising pixel tracking and conversion measurement for mangoboard.net. Fonts: Google Fonts — delivers web fonts for typography for mangoboard.net. JavaScript Library: jQuery (version 1.11.1.) — provides utility functions and DOM manipulation for mangoboard.net. We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Analytics 4 Measurement ID G-NNYV3NL009, Google Tag Manager container GTM-PKLGKCF, and Meta (Facebook) Pixel ID 197985600679280. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.

mangoboard.net delivers its homepage in 23530ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 96 KB, and we detected 291 resource requests loading assets from 18 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. No compression is currently enabled on mangoboard.net. Enabling Brotli or Gzip compression could reduce page size by 60-80% for text-based assets (HTML, CSS, JavaScript), significantly improving load times and reducing bandwidth costs. This is one of the simplest and most impactful performance optimizations available. Asset minification status: 1 out of 18 CSS files and 7 out of 27 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 37 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of mangoboard.net produces approximately 0.05g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of A. This places the website among the cleanest on the web, demonstrating efficient use of server resources and optimized content delivery. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 96 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for mangoboard.net. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

mangoboard.net resolves to the IPv4 address 211.43.13.58, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 2 name servers: ns.mangoboard.net and ns2.mangoboard.net. Having 2 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for mangoboard.net is handled by co.kr with 1 MX records configured: mailapp.hiworks.co.kr. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC is not configured, leaving the domain vulnerable to email spoofing and phishing attacks that impersonate this domain. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is not enabled for mangoboard.net. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions.

The homepage of mangoboard.net contains 669 words of visible text content. This is a moderate amount of content. The page is structured with 7 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The page includes 132 images. 72 images (55%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 45% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images. The link structure consists of 36 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 14 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 27 external JavaScript files, 18 CSS stylesheets, and 1 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages), robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior), and Schema.org structured data (WebPage and WebSite). The website has social media presence across 4 platforms: Facebook (@tr), Instagram (@mangoboard_), Youtube (@UCDDh3JlLGBDgq5Kz_Raw_aQ), and Pinterest (@mangoboardnet). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.

The title tag for mangoboard.net is well-optimized at 31 characters: "망고보드 공식 홈페이지 | 프리미엄 디자인 동영상 플랫폼". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation. The meta description is 87 characters (well-optimized): "망고보드 AI 디자이너로 쉽게 시작해 보세요! 무료 디자인·동영상 템플릿과 AI 이미지로 카드뉴스·PPT·포스터 등을 제작하세요. 원스톱 인쇄도 가능합니다.". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The canonical url is correctly set to https://www.mangoboard.net/, preventing duplicate content issues and the page language is declared as ko. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 4/4 recommended fields: OG title ("망고보드 공식 홈페이지 | 프리미엄 디자인 동영상 플랫폼..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), OG type (website). These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary_large_image is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary_large_image" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type. The site implements Schema.org structured data with the following types: WebPage and WebSite. Structured data helps search engines understand the page content and can enable rich results (featured snippets, knowledge panels, star ratings) in Google search results, which can significantly increase click-through rates. The meta keywords tag contains 1 terms including 망고보드. Note: Google has officially confirmed that it does not use the meta keywords tag as a ranking signal. However, some other search engines (Bing, Yandex) may still reference it.