🌐

readme.com

US · Online since 28+ years
✓ HTTPS ✓ HTTP/2 ✓ Gzip 60.0% ⚡ 4810ms
readme.com Overview

Get a snapshot of readme.com's online performance, security posture, and technology profile.

readme.com Website Overview & Technology Report

70
Trust Score
Likely Safe
20
Security
Headers: 1/6
4810ms
Response
Slow
7
Technologies
Detected
🤖 AI Analysis

We performed a comprehensive analysis of readme.com on 2026-06-30. The website returned an HTTP 200 status code with a server response time of 4810ms. The page is served over HTTP/2 protocol with Gzip compression enabled, achieving approximately 60.0% size reduction. The total page weight is 899 KB. The website uses a secure HTTPS connection with a valid SSL certificate issued by Let's Encrypt (DV type). The connection is encrypted using TLS 1.3 with the TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite and sha256WithRSAEncryption signature algorithm. The certificate covers 1 domain(s) (Subject Alternative Names) and expires on 2026-08-05, which is 36 days from now. The security headers analysis reveals a score of 20/100 (poor). The following security headers are properly configured: Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS). However, the site is missing Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, which could expose the site and its users to cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and other web-based attacks. Our technology detection scan identified 7 technologies across 7 categories powering readme.com. The detected stack includes Next.js media, React, Vite, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Vercel, and Font Awesome. The site uses Next.js as its primary framework (version media). The UI is built with React. Based on our comprehensive analysis of domain age, SSL configuration, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status, readme.com receives an overall trust score of 70/100, classified as "Likely Safe".

Status Code200 OK
HTTP VersionHTTP/2
ServerVercel
Page Size899 KB
Total Requests265
3rd Party Domains8
SSL CertificateLet's Encrypt (DV) · 36 days left
TLS VersionTLS 1.3
IP Address216.150.16.129
readme.com Trust & Safety

Evaluate trustworthiness based on age, SSL, email authentication, security headers, and blacklist status across 8 threat databases.

readme.com Trust Score & Safety Analysis

70
Trust Score
20
Security
🤖 Trust Analysis

After conducting a thorough safety and legitimacy analysis, readme.com receives a trust score of 70/100, which places it in the "Likely Safe" category. This score is calculated by evaluating multiple factors including SSL certificate validity, domain registration history, email authentication protocols, security header configuration, and blacklist status across major threat intelligence databases. The analysis identified several positive trust signals: a valid HTTPS connection protecting data in transit, HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) enforcement preventing protocol downgrade attacks, a valid SSL certificate issued by Let's Encrypt with 36 days until expiration, SPF (Sender Policy Framework) email authentication preventing email spoofing, DMARC email authentication with a quarantine policy, and a well-established domain registered for over 28.1 years, indicating long-term commitment and legitimacy. Areas of concern include: the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header, which leaves the site more vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, no X-Frame-Options header, which could allow the site to be embedded in malicious iframes (clickjacking), missing Referrer-Policy, potentially leaking URL information to third parties, the domain's WHOIS information is hidden behind a privacy service, making it harder to verify the owner's identity, and DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing attacks. While these issues don't necessarily indicate malicious intent, they represent areas where the website's security posture could be improved. We checked readme.com against 8 major blacklist databases including Google Safe Browsing, Phishtank, Urlhaus, Openphish, Dnsfilter, Spamhaus Dbl, Surbl, and Virustotal. The domain passed all 8 checks with a clean status, meaning it has not been flagged for phishing, malware distribution, spam, or other malicious activities by any of the tested threat intelligence providers. The domain is registered through 1API GmbH based in US, with a registration date of 1998-05-30 and expiration date of 2027-05-29.

HTTPS + HSTS
+12
Domain Age (28 yrs)
+10
SPF + DMARC
+6
SSL Certificate
+7
Security Headers
−5

Security Headers

Content-Security-Policy✗ Missing
HSTS✓ Set
X-Frame-Options✗ Missing
X-Content-Type-Options✗ Missing
Referrer-Policy✗ Missing
Permissions-Policy✗ Missing

Blacklist Checks 8/8 Clean ✓

Google Safe Browsing
Phishtank
Urlhaus
Openphish
Dnsfilter
Spamhaus Dbl
Surbl
Virustotal

Rankings & Estimates

Tranco Rank#123,776 worldwide

🔍 Analyze Your Own Website

Check your site's trust score, security headers, tech stack and 50+ metrics — completely free.

Analyze Now →
readme.com Technology Stack 7 detected

Discover every technology powering this website — from CMS and frameworks to analytics, payments, and marketing tools.

readme.com Technology Stack & Detected Technologies

🤖 Stack Analysis

Our technology detection engine scanned readme.com and identified 7 distinct technologies across 7 categories. This analysis is performed by examining HTTP response headers, HTML source code patterns, JavaScript library fingerprints, CSS framework signatures, and DNS records. Framework: Next.js (version media) — provides the application framework and routing for readme.com. UI Library: React — handles the user interface rendering and component management for readme.com. Build Tool: Vite — bundles and optimizes the JavaScript and CSS assets for readme.com. Tag Manager: Google Tag Manager — manages marketing and analytics tags without code changes for readme.com. Chat: Intercom — provides live chat and customer communication for readme.com. Hosting: Vercel — provides the server infrastructure for readme.com. Icon Set: Font Awesome — provides additional functionality for readme.com. We also extracted the following tracking identifiers: Google Tag Manager container GTM-MLTXQ5D. These IDs can be used to identify other websites operated by the same organization.

⚛️ Framework
⚛️ UI Library
🔨 Build Tool
📊 Tag Manager
💬 Chat
🖥️ Hosting
🎯 Icon Set

Tracking IDs Detected

gtm_idGTM-MLTXQ5D
readme.com Performance & Web Vitals

Response time, compression, CDN usage, Core Web Vitals, and environmental impact metrics for readme.com.

readme.com Performance & Web Vitals Report

🤖 Performance Analysis

readme.com delivers its homepage in 4810ms (server response time), which is considered slow by industry standards. The total page weight is 899 KB, and we detected 265 resource requests loading assets from 8 third-party domains. A high number of third-party domains can significantly impact page load time due to additional DNS lookups and TLS handshakes required for each domain. The website uses Gzip compression for text-based assets, achieving an estimated 60.0% reduction in transfer size. This reduces bandwidth usage and improves page load times, especially for visitors on slower connections. Asset minification status: 0 out of 6 CSS files and 0 out of 37 JavaScript files are minified. Minifying the remaining 43 unminified file(s) could further reduce page weight by 10-30% for those assets. Minification is a best practice that reduces download sizes without affecting functionality. From an environmental perspective, each page view of readme.com produces approximately 0.44g of CO₂, earning a carbon rating of D. The website's carbon footprint could be reduced by optimizing images, enabling compression, reducing third-party scripts, and leveraging caching. For reference, the average web page produces about 0.5g of CO₂ per page view. The page weight of 899 KB is the primary factor in this calculation. Core Web Vitals data from the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) is not available for readme.com. This typically means the site doesn't have enough real-world Chrome user traffic to generate statistically significant field data, or the domain is not included in the CrUX dataset. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are important Google ranking factors that measure real user experience.

Response Time4810ms Slow
Page Size899 KB
CompressionGzip 60.0% savings
CDNNot detected
Carbon / Page View0.44g · Rating D
readme.com DNS & Domain Info

Complete DNS record analysis including email authentication (SPF, DMARC, DKIM), registrar details, and subdomain discovery.

readme.com DNS Records, Email Authentication & Domain Registration

🤖 DNS Analysis

readme.com resolves to the IPv4 address 216.150.16.129, but does not support IPv6. IPv6 adoption is increasingly important as IPv4 address space becomes exhausted, and some ISPs and regions are transitioning to IPv6-only connectivity. The domain has 2 A record(s) configured. The domain name system is managed by 2 name servers: jeremy.ns.cloudflare.com and uma.ns.cloudflare.com. Having 2 name servers provides good redundancy — if one fails, the others can continue serving DNS queries. The choice of name servers often indicates the DNS hosting provider or CDN service being used. Email for readme.com is handled by Google Workspace with 7 MX records configured: aspmx.l.google.com, alt1.aspmx.l.google.com, and alt2.aspmx.l.google.com and 4 more. Multiple MX records provide failover redundancy — if the primary mail server is unavailable, email will be routed to the next available server. SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is configured, which specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of this domain. This helps prevent email spoofing and improves email deliverability. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) is configured with a quarantine policy — a moderate setting, directing unauthorized emails to spam/junk folders. DKIM was not detected. Without DKIM, recipients cannot cryptographically verify that emails claiming to be from this domain are authentic. DNSSEC is not enabled for readme.com. While not critical for most websites, DNSSEC adds an important security layer by ensuring DNS responses haven't been tampered with during transit. Enabling DNSSEC is recommended for domains handling sensitive data or financial transactions. The domain is registered through 1API GmbH (US). It was first registered on 1998-05-30 and is set to expire on 2027-05-29, making it 28.1 years old. Our subdomain enumeration scan discovered 4 active subdomains for readme.com: api.readme.com, blog.readme.com, dev.readme.com, and www.readme.com. Active subdomains can reveal the organization's infrastructure, including development environments, API endpoints, and third-party service integrations.

IP Address216.150.16.129
ASNAS16509 · Amazon.com, Inc.
LocationWalnut, US
Nameserversjeremy.ns.cloudflare.com
MX ProviderGoogle Workspace (aspmx.l.google.com)
Registrar1API GmbH
Registered1998-05-30 (28 yrs)
Expires2027-05-29
CountryUS
SPF✓ Configured
DMARC✓ quarantine
DMARC Recordv=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@readme.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc@readme.com; aspf=r; adkim=r
DKIM✗ Not found
DNSSEC✗ Not enabled
IPv6Not detected
WHOIS Privacy🔒 Private

Subdomains 4 found

apiblogdevwww

TXT Records / Service Verifications 7

Google ✓ +6 more
readme.com Page Analysis

Content structure, media assets, cookie usage, payment methods, and social media presence for readme.com.

readme.com Page Content Analysis

🤖 Content Analysis

The homepage of readme.com contains 2,194 words of visible text content. This is a substantial amount of content that provides good opportunities for search engine indexing. The page is structured with 1 H2 headings, 0 H3 headings, 0 H4 headings. The page includes 116 images. 2 images (2%) are missing alt text attributes, which is a significant concern for both accessibility and SEO. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images to visually impaired users, and search engines use alt text to understand image content. Only 98% of images have proper alt text — we recommend adding descriptive alt attributes to all images. The link structure consists of 31 internal links pointing to other pages on the same domain and 46 external links pointing to third-party websites. There are 37 external JavaScript files, 6 CSS stylesheets, and 1 iframes on the page. The site implements the following web standards and features: XML Sitemap (helps search engines discover all pages) and robots.txt (controls search engine crawling behavior). Notable missing features: Schema.org structured data. Adding these could improve search engine discoverability and rich result eligibility. The website has social media presence across 3 platforms: Twitter (@readme), Linkedin (@readme), and Github (@readmeio). An active social media presence is a positive trust indicator and helps build brand awareness and customer engagement.

Word Count2,194 words
Images116 total · 2 missing alt · 98% alt coverage
Internal Links31
External Links46
JS Files37
CSS Files6
Iframes1

Social Media Presence 3 platforms

𝕏 Twitter 💼 Linkedin 🐙 Github
readme.com SEO & Content Analysis

Evaluate on-page SEO factors including meta tags, Schema.org markup, content metrics, social presence, and environmental impact.

readme.com SEO Analysis, Meta Tags & Content

🤖 SEO Analysis

The title tag for readme.com is well-optimized at 45 characters: "ReadMe · Developer-friendly API documentation". The length falls within the ideal range for Google search results, ensuring the full title is displayed without truncation. The meta description is 86 characters (well-optimized): "ReadMe helps you create beautiful, interactive API documentation that developers love.". Google typically displays up to 155-160 characters of the meta description in search results. A compelling meta description with a clear call-to-action can significantly improve click-through rates from search results. The page language is declared as en and a favicon is configured. Open Graph meta tags are configured with 3/4 recommended fields: OG title ("ReadMe · Developer-friendly API documentation..."), OG description, OG image (social sharing thumbnail), These tags control how the page appears when shared on Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social media platforms that support the Open Graph protocol. A Twitter Card of type summary_large_image is configured, which controls how links appear when shared on Twitter/X. The "summary_large_image" type displays a large image preview, which typically generates higher engagement rates than the basic card type.

TitleReadMe · Developer-friendly API documentation
H1
Word Count2,194 words
Images116 total · 2 missing alt
Internal Links31
External Links46
JS Files37
CSS Files6
Heading StructureH2:1
Iframes1
MinificationJS: 0/37 minified · CSS: 0/6 minified
Sitemap✓ Found
Robots.txt✓ Found
CanonicalNot set
Languageen
Open Graph✓ Complete
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
PWANot detected
RSS FeedNot detected
AMPNot detected
Carbon / Visit0.44g · Rating D

Google SERP Preview

ReadMe · Developer-friendly API documentation
https://readme.com
ReadMe helps you create beautiful, interactive API documentation that developers love.

META TAGS & SCHEMA.ORG

META TAGS

TitleReadMe · Developer-friendly API documentation
Title Length45 chars Good
Meta Desc Length86 chars Too short
H1
Languageen
CanonicalNot set
Meta Robots

SCHEMA.ORG & SOCIAL

Schema Types
OG Type
OG Image✓ Set
Twitter Card✓ summary_large_image
Favicon✓ Found

📊 Compare With Your Competitors

See how your website stacks up against readme.com in trust, speed, security, and technology.

Compare Now →
🛡 Is this your website?

Show visitors your trust score — add a free badge to your site

Trust Score Badge Get Your Badge →